PonyFans.com

SMU Fan Site
http://www.ponyfans.com/phpBB3/

This looks like a post DP from the early 90s

http://www.ponyfans.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=69206

Page 1 of 1

This looks like a post DP from the early 90s

PostPosted: Fri Nov 29, 2013 1:35 pm
by Dwan
Pathetic. A football program is the best way to market your school. For 25 years we have been marketing that we are pathetic with a few signs of being mediocre.

Re: This looks like a post DP from the early 90s

PostPosted: Fri Nov 29, 2013 1:36 pm
by Charleston Pony
we always look good when we get a national TV game

Re: This looks like a post DP from the early 90s

PostPosted: Fri Nov 29, 2013 2:09 pm
by birddogger
I hate to say this, but, this program isn't going any direction but down. We are back to the pre-JJ days but without the excuses the previous coaches had. Sad.

Re: This looks like a post DP from the early 90s

PostPosted: Fri Nov 29, 2013 3:22 pm
by Treadway21
Except we were playing good teams in the post DP SWC.

Re: This looks like a post DP from the early 90s

PostPosted: Fri Nov 29, 2013 4:26 pm
by Charleston Pony
Treadway21 wrote:Except we were playing good teams in the post DP SWC.


A&M was a good team this year. Tech, TCU and Houston are decent/average/mediocre teams and UCF looks like they might be another good team. The SWC was pretty weak in those early 90's but we are clearly more talented today than what we put on the field in the early 90's

Re: This looks like a post DP from the early 90s

PostPosted: Fri Nov 29, 2013 4:43 pm
by BRStang
Charleston Pony wrote:
Treadway21 wrote:Except we were playing good teams in the post DP SWC.


A&M was a good team this year. Tech, TCU and Houston are decent/average/mediocre teams and UCF looks like they might be another good team. The SWC was pretty weak in those early 90's but we are clearly more talented today than what we put on the field in the early 90's


I disagree

Re: This looks like a post DP from the early 90s

PostPosted: Fri Nov 29, 2013 4:52 pm
by Treadway21
Charleston Pony wrote:
Treadway21 wrote:Except we were playing good teams in the post DP SWC.


A&M was a good team this year. Tech, TCU and Houston are decent/average/mediocre teams and UCF looks like they might be another good team. The SWC was pretty weak in those early 90's but we are clearly more talented today than what we put on the field in the early 90's
maybe - you could make that argument, but we have no excuse for not being competitive like we did post DP. This Houston team is not as good as any SWC team from the 90s and Tech and TCU turned out to be very mediocre teams.

This team looked totally unprepared not physically outclassed. That in my mind is the difference.

Re: This looks like a post DP from the early 90s

PostPosted: Fri Nov 29, 2013 4:56 pm
by redpony
yep- unprepared, unmotivated and had a very poor game plan. Not a good recipe for a novice QB.

Re: This looks like a post DP from the early 90s

PostPosted: Fri Nov 29, 2013 4:58 pm
by Charleston Pony
BRStang wrote:
Charleston Pony wrote:
Treadway21 wrote:Except we were playing good teams in the post DP SWC.


A&M was a good team this year. Tech, TCU and Houston are decent/average/mediocre teams and UCF looks like they might be another good team. The SWC was pretty weak in those early 90's but we are clearly more talented today than what we put on the field in the early 90's


I disagree


I'm looking at the talent we have on the field today and comparing it to the teams in the early 90's when we were re-building the roster...as in the team that lost to Houston 95-21. I would like to see what Gregg and Rossley could do with this level of talent compared to what they had in those days