PonyFans.com

I had never heard of this before, but seems apres peau:

"In organizational decision-making situations, there's a powerful force called 'escalating commitment'. It refers to a mental tendency of the original decision-maker to double-down, throw good money after bad, even when objective evidence indicates that the original decision has proven to be a poor one.

It's why, e.g., a general might throw a fresh wave of troops against a defensive line even after a first rush was emphatically repulsed, why a CEO might tell his engineers to spend more money drilling in an area even if the wells have come up dry, and ... why an AD/Booster might say "let's give him another year or two" when a coach is an obvious loser.

Basically, the psychological mechanism has to do with "saving face", avoiding the embarrassment of being publicly proven wrong. Especially in cases where an AD /University President was publicly identified with the hiring of a coach, it is particularly hard for them to dump that guy, because it reflects badly on them."

Is this what is happening with RGT and the CofC?

Essentially, the "Naughty Nine" have been replaced by the "Circle of Champions". These individuals make all the decisions and control the fate of the program by themselves. We will live or die by their decisions. Since it looks like June's approval rating among the CoC is still skyhigh it really doesn't matter that literally 99.9% of the rest of us want him gone.

Perhaps we should be flooding their inboxes instead?

StallionsModelT wrote:Essentially, the "Naughty Nine" have been replaced by the "Circle of Champions". These individuals make all the decisions and control the fate of the program by themselves. We will live or die by their decisions. Since it looks like June's approval rating among the CoC is still skyhigh it really doesn't matter that literally 99.9% of the rest of us want him gone.

That's how things are...the top 1% decide for the 99%

peruna11 wrote:Perhaps we should be flooding their inboxes instead?

Not a bad idea.....

StallionsModelT wrote:Essentially, the "Naughty Nine" have been replaced by the "Circle of Champions". These individuals make all the decisions and control the fate of the program by themselves. We will live or die by their decisions. Since it looks like June's approval rating among the CoC is still skyhigh it really doesn't matter that literally 99.9% of the rest of us want him gone.

EXCEPT THE NAUGHTY 9 WON US SOME STUFF!

Who makes up the CofC?

Sewell, Ford, Dedmans, Hunt, etc. The same lot that have 90% of the school named after them.

Usual folks you would think of (Sewell, Ford) and a few "newer" boosters as well.

Rather than "escalating commitment", I think it's been more an issue of "half measures" in that our administration wanted to dip their proverbial toes into the idea of returning SMU to glory rather than going all in like (most of) our competition. They were aiming at being competitive in WAC, CUSA and now the American rather than being competitive with our natural and traditional rivals.

IMO there is an argument that "doubling down" in this situation would be for the C of C to buy out Jones and also to commit to fund his replacement. The Circle was assembled by an AD no longer at SMU and with goals / promises that can no longer be reached with the demise of the old Big East and our landing in the rump end of the conference with no immediate BCS or P5 prospects.

To me "donor fatigue" as otherwise discussed on this board explains what we see.

I suspect any new agreement for deep pocketed enthusiasts to support football will be after a lot of talk withe university administration. I see those talks as surely scheduled, perhaps under way, or maybe concluded.

I also believe that the university president does not care much one way or the other about the sports programs. If a sports program enhancement is funded by money from fans that goes for coaches salaries and so on, that is good. It frees up money otherwise received by the university for purposes which may have nothing to do with sports. SMU writes the actual paychecks and there is perhaps less risk of an NCAA violation. And if the school permits the sports donors to pay for football or basketball, maybe one of them will someday make a gift to the endowment which is probably of greater interest outside the athletic department.

Post their names and find their emails!

What will we do if June's 2014 squad is actually really good and they come away with a 9-3?

" why a CEO might tell his engineers to spend more money drilling in an area even if the wells have come up dry, and ... why an AD/Booster might say "let's give him another year or two" when a coach is an obvious loser."

The "obvious loser" has done much better than the previous 4 dry wells (Gregg, Rossley, Cavan,
Bennett) drilled

BTW, the odds on hitting a producing well are 1 in 10 which is much better than finding a LB that
can coach football. Dream on