PonyFans.com

http://content.ncaa.org/ncaa-membership_and_outreach/Board_SC_on_Governance_Draft_System_Design_1.9.14_CONVENTION_v_5C.pdf

Division I Board Steering Committee on Governance Draft New Governance System Design January 2014 - (14 page power point).

Apologies if this has been already posted - but I haven't seen it on the board yet.

Sooooooooooooooooooooooooo.....?

Formalizes what schools will need to agree to to move up. Just like FBS/FCS split

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/larry-atk ... 98694.html

I agree with what this guy wrote. The Big 5 conferences already have huge advantages without those demands that they have recently placed. They should stop whining, unless they would like to have a scenario in which none of the G5 teams play them and they are stuck scheduling each other...(although it would be fun to watch their 10-2 teams go 7-5 )

They took home $1.5 Billion in revenue from all sources compared to the Group of 5 which only took $175 million.

Does this mean we can bring Sherwood & what's left of the "naughty nine" back in to the SMU fold? Think SMU should petition the NCAA to get that permanent ban rescinded.

I do not think the NCAA banned them, SMU did. I understand Sherwood attends some games.

LHS81 wrote:Does this mean we can bring Sherwood & what's left of the "naughty nine" back in to the SMU fold? Think SMU should petition the NCAA to get that permanent ban rescinded.

Let's bring them back


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk