My thoughts on... June's thoughts

1) As June has always said, he has a staff of really good analysts who like to watch game film, find the kids they think fits the system great, and then make offers to those kids. They also like to have the kids in camp so that they can see them in person and get to know personalities.
2) June likes to recruit kids who are a fit with the personality of the team.
3) We are going to hold scholarships to the end every year and see what happens in the transfer market. More players are going to graduate early with two years to play and look to move like GG did. And there are always the players like Gresham that pop up at the last minute, or what happened with Army Prep.
- The strategy plays to the strengths of the coaching staff. A lot of caches with scouting background, and for some of them they did this method for years in Hawaii.
- If you are going to try to be the "underdog", you have to have a great locker room, and this strategy plays to that.
- I think the third strategy is really good and really important. It sounds like we may get some transfers in the Spring, and I wonder if that is why all our Guards are leaving school early.
- In the "old days" the first point worked. There wasn't a lot of tape on younger players, or a lot of tape in general, and they weren't offered early anyways. So, you had plenty of time to see them play their first games of the season and then make an offer based on how they look.
- That is no longer the case, however. Most coaching staffs form good relationships with high school coaches, who tell them in advance "this guy is going to be good". The school then offers that player without seeing them on tape.
- SMU's response to that is the camps. Try to get Juniors out to camp who will start for the first time in the Fall, evaluate them before there is tape, and offer them out of camp, before they play a game. It also allows them to judge the kid's personality and see if they will fit in with the team.
- Overally, I don't disagree with the "tapes don't lie" philosophy. I also agree that you have to make sure the kids mesh well with the team. However, there are two improvements that I would suggest:
1) The camps are going to happen too late to get in early on the next new superstar player. The coaches are going to point out to other recruiters who the gem is going to be, and other coaches will jump on that gem before you get your look. One way around this is to attend practice, and look at the kids in practice yourself. Evaluate the teams in person, get a good look at the kids. If you value your own eyes over the opinions of a HS coach or a list service, then you have to get out to practice to get in early. That also allows you to meet the coaching staff and learn about the kids' personality, which doesn't come out on game film. The other option (and I don't know if this is legal) is to start offering Sophmore Camps instead of Junior Days. Get a bunch of kids out there a year early and start offering those kids on the spot.
2) When evaluating the tape, and you know that everyone in the country is looking at the left tackle, who is really good, but you notice that the right guard is really good... it is fine to take a look at the right guard. But why not go ahead and offer the left tackle for sh!ts and grins? Just throw it out there and see what happens. It costs nothing, and it is what Baylor, Tech, Cincy, and Houston all do. Just do it. If they bite, then learn a bit about the personality and back off if they are jerks. Make a point of offering the best players on the team, regardless of who else is looking at them. The record of this staff turning 2 star athletes into NFL players is awesome. Just think about how good the team would be if we for whatever reason were able to land a couple of super studs to pair with them.
I think there might be some adjustments being made in this direction; I think there was a comment last night about Mason or someone running around looking at 2015 kids all fall.
For the record, the "at our level" rubbed me the wrong way as well. I get it - we aren't Texas, and we aren't playing in that conference. And we don't have unlimited resources, so we don't want to spend a ton of time going after players we probably aren't going to get. But the thing is, I don't want to give up *trying* to get back to that level. I don't care if it is just a cursory try. At least give it a wild shot! That was frustrating to hear.
2) June likes to recruit kids who are a fit with the personality of the team.
3) We are going to hold scholarships to the end every year and see what happens in the transfer market. More players are going to graduate early with two years to play and look to move like GG did. And there are always the players like Gresham that pop up at the last minute, or what happened with Army Prep.
- The strategy plays to the strengths of the coaching staff. A lot of caches with scouting background, and for some of them they did this method for years in Hawaii.
- If you are going to try to be the "underdog", you have to have a great locker room, and this strategy plays to that.
- I think the third strategy is really good and really important. It sounds like we may get some transfers in the Spring, and I wonder if that is why all our Guards are leaving school early.
- In the "old days" the first point worked. There wasn't a lot of tape on younger players, or a lot of tape in general, and they weren't offered early anyways. So, you had plenty of time to see them play their first games of the season and then make an offer based on how they look.
- That is no longer the case, however. Most coaching staffs form good relationships with high school coaches, who tell them in advance "this guy is going to be good". The school then offers that player without seeing them on tape.
- SMU's response to that is the camps. Try to get Juniors out to camp who will start for the first time in the Fall, evaluate them before there is tape, and offer them out of camp, before they play a game. It also allows them to judge the kid's personality and see if they will fit in with the team.
- Overally, I don't disagree with the "tapes don't lie" philosophy. I also agree that you have to make sure the kids mesh well with the team. However, there are two improvements that I would suggest:
1) The camps are going to happen too late to get in early on the next new superstar player. The coaches are going to point out to other recruiters who the gem is going to be, and other coaches will jump on that gem before you get your look. One way around this is to attend practice, and look at the kids in practice yourself. Evaluate the teams in person, get a good look at the kids. If you value your own eyes over the opinions of a HS coach or a list service, then you have to get out to practice to get in early. That also allows you to meet the coaching staff and learn about the kids' personality, which doesn't come out on game film. The other option (and I don't know if this is legal) is to start offering Sophmore Camps instead of Junior Days. Get a bunch of kids out there a year early and start offering those kids on the spot.
2) When evaluating the tape, and you know that everyone in the country is looking at the left tackle, who is really good, but you notice that the right guard is really good... it is fine to take a look at the right guard. But why not go ahead and offer the left tackle for sh!ts and grins? Just throw it out there and see what happens. It costs nothing, and it is what Baylor, Tech, Cincy, and Houston all do. Just do it. If they bite, then learn a bit about the personality and back off if they are jerks. Make a point of offering the best players on the team, regardless of who else is looking at them. The record of this staff turning 2 star athletes into NFL players is awesome. Just think about how good the team would be if we for whatever reason were able to land a couple of super studs to pair with them.
I think there might be some adjustments being made in this direction; I think there was a comment last night about Mason or someone running around looking at 2015 kids all fall.
For the record, the "at our level" rubbed me the wrong way as well. I get it - we aren't Texas, and we aren't playing in that conference. And we don't have unlimited resources, so we don't want to spend a ton of time going after players we probably aren't going to get. But the thing is, I don't want to give up *trying* to get back to that level. I don't care if it is just a cursory try. At least give it a wild shot! That was frustrating to hear.