SportingNews.com: June ranked #2 coach in AAC after O'Leary

by **Big12Mustang** » Sun Apr 27, 2014 11:58 pm

http://www.sportingnews.com/ncaa-footba ... ll#slide/2

by **Lebanese4Life** » Mon Apr 28, 2014 5:59 am

Lol what a joke. Shows how pitiful this conference is in football.

by **Junior** » Tue May 06, 2014 6:20 pm

#2? at what?

by **Big12Mustang** » Tue May 06, 2014 6:24 pm

Best coach.

by **malonish** » Wed May 07, 2014 10:17 am

About that...

by **Big12Mustang** » Wed May 07, 2014 10:37 am

I'm just going to go for the ride this season. It's a win win for me in any case. If we suck, I get to enjoy seeing June get canned, but if he pulls it off and we go in a dream season...I get to make plans for a Fiesta/Cotton Bowl.

:lol:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fs0uLXodDVA

by **Grant Carter** » Wed May 07, 2014 11:27 am

Just remember, if a publication publishes a list you agree with then it proves your point irrefutably. If they publish a list you disagree with, they are obviously idiots.

If bleacher report publishes a list you agree with it is ok to reference it but you have to make an obligatory comment about how normally they are idiots but even they got this one right.

by **fifty** » Wed May 07, 2014 12:40 pm

"Would be fun to watch Jonesâ€™ pass-happy offense at a Power 5 school."

by **Big12Mustang** » Wed May 07, 2014 1:25 pm

fifty wrote:"Would be fun to watch Jonesâ€™ pass-happy offense at a Power 5 school."

I don't get what he is trying to say in that one...is he referring to SMU becoming a Power 5 school and therefore having better talent for his offense? OR are they suggesting June coaching at a school in the Power 5?

by **sbsmith** » Wed May 07, 2014 1:45 pm

Big12Mustang wrote:
fifty wrote:"Would be fun to watch Jonesâ€™ pass-happy offense at a Power 5 school."

I don't get what he is trying to say in that one...is he referring to SMU becoming a Power 5 school and therefore having better talent for his offense? OR are they suggesting June coaching at a school in the Power 5?

It's obviously the latter though that will never happen because June is in his sixties and he hates recruiting.

by **SMU 86** » Wed May 07, 2014 1:54 pm

Looking at that list of coaches I think SMU could very easily go to a bowl game. It would be a disappointment not to do so imo.

by **fifty** » Wed May 07, 2014 2:10 pm

Yeah but don't forget about our 1-3 or 0-4 start though.

by **SMU 86** » Wed May 07, 2014 3:02 pm

fifty wrote:Yeah but don't forget about our 1-3 or 0-4 start though.

Conference schedule is so weak that an 0-4 or 1-3 star should not stop SMU from going bowling. That list of coaches almost looks Sunbeltish.

by **sbsmith** » Wed May 07, 2014 3:25 pm

SMU 86 wrote:
fifty wrote:Yeah but don't forget about our 1-3 or 0-4 start though.

Conference schedule is so weak that an 0-4 or 1-3 star should not stop SMU from going bowling. That list of coaches almost looks Sunbeltish.

an 0-4 or 1-3 start means we'd have to go 6-2 or 5-3 in conference play to make a bowl. The conference schedule is no easier than it was last year (we only went 4-4) and our talent level has decreased noticeably.

by **GiddyUp** » Wed May 07, 2014 9:37 pm

what a silly ranking, who cares

if ranking means wins, recruiting, and developing players.... ?