|
Mike Aresco stands .. on expansion issueModerators: PonyPride, SmooPower
28 posts
• Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2
Mike Aresco stands .. on expansion issueAAC commissioner Mike Aresco stands firm on expansion issue, talks importance of football to league's future
http://www.masslive.com/umassfootball/i ... sco_s.html Pony Up
Re: Mike Aresco stands .. on expansion issueNo UMass. We already have UConn and Temple covering that market.
Re: Mike Aresco stands .. on expansion issueBut we'd miss out on the joke UMass-hole.
Leader of the Band-itos.
Mustangsabu wrote: Malonish! You are the man! PonyPride: I think malonish is right peruna81: God bless you, malonish. ![]()
Re: Mike Aresco stands .. on expansion issueUMass is the absolute dump of FBS football.
Teams that should be considered in AAC expands: BYU Boise (I know, terrible history with them, but a solid program and fanbase that travels well) UNLV FAU/FIU if they establish solid FB programs 2005 PonyFans.com Rookie of the Year Award Recipient
Re: Mike Aresco stands .. on expansion issueDon't do anything that forecloses a knockout of MWC by adding BYU, SDSU and/or Air Force, Boise or Fresno for football only
"With a quarter of a tank of gas, we can get everything we need right here in DFW." -SMU Head Coach Chad Morris
When momentum starts rolling downhill in recruiting-WATCH OUT.
Re: Mike Aresco stands .. on expansion issue
Without question, adding BYU would be the highest priority. Your examples suggest a three division vs. two division FB conference. These teams would kill MWC (not a bad idea) and firmly position AAC as a legitimate contributor to a Power 6. I have always like AF, but their connection to MWC is very pragmatic for them. As it sits now, just adding BYU and another team in the East in FB only might be easiest. Army is isn't competitive, but it would balance with Navy, who is FB only in the West. Further, the Cadets do draw fans nationally. In any case, we needs to persuade the BYU Cougars that independence is a dilemma for them long term. Adding beyond that is worth discussing. Pony Up
Re: Mike Aresco stands .. on expansion issueI like Mr. Aresco's comments. I think he's done a pretty admirable job in a tough situation.
As for AAC expansion, there is no rush and no incentive right now unless BYU wants to play ball and be a regular member without any sweetheart concessions like the MWC made for Boise State. With the new stipend rules and the increasing budgetary concerns of several MWC schools it is only a matter of time until several of those programs come running to the AAC begging to be added so that they can rid themselves of the shackles of programs like UNM, Wyoming, SJSU, Hawaii, etc. Honestly, I think there will be another break within both the AAC and the MWC of schools that have the financial means to mimic the actions of the P5. I believe the following conference will be formed: 12 Teams West - BYU, AFA, Boise State, UNLV, SMU, Houston East - Memphis, Cincinnati, UCF, USF, UConn, Navy If you feel confident that the CA schools will have the money to compete then you can bump to 14 West - SDSU, Fresno State, BYU, Boise State, SMU, Houston East - Memphis, Cincinnati, UCF, USF, ECU, UConn, Navy That is the truly "national" conference that has solid programs in both basketball and football that, IMO, truly represents the programs of the P5 that have real aspirations to be on the national scene. Back off Warchild seriously.
Re: Mike Aresco stands .. on expansion issueI know I will get slammed by most on this board but I would consider UTEP in the mix somewhere if some of the others don't work out. Texas school with a solid fan base. They were part of the original Mountain West Conference and I feel have gotten the short end of the stick in regards to realignment.
Re: Mike Aresco stands .. on expansion issue
They got the short end because their football program is lousy and they have no market. They're exactly where they belong. They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty or security
-Benjamin Franklin
Re: Mike Aresco stands .. on expansion issueUTEP offers nothing. Terrible market, terrible academics, money problems, and awful on-field product. I would take UTSA before UTEP.
Back off Warchild seriously.
Re: Mike Aresco stands .. on expansion issueBYU = vomit
Re: Mike Aresco stands .. on expansion issueVomit all you want but they are the biggest fish out there in the P5. If the AAC were able to get them to play nice we would welcome them with open arms.
Back off Warchild seriously.
Re: Mike Aresco stands .. on expansion issueI still think we should take Wichita St. in everything except football, and offset the Navy addition
Re: Mike Aresco stands .. on expansion issueEveryone is missing the big point. The big 5 are never gonna agree to a big 6. If anything, Vanderbilt, TCU, Northwestern, and Baylor better sleep with one eye open. I could see Notre Dame, BYU, one of the Florida directional schools and one other taking their place..........Oh and get ready, the big 5 will have their own basketball championship series as well..............
Re: Mike Aresco stands .. on expansion issuenm
Last edited by B1GPonyFan on Tue Jun 24, 2014 10:32 am, edited 1 time in total.
28 posts
• Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2
Who is onlineUsers browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests |
|