The new ESPN College Football Proffessional Minor Leagues

Realistically, ESPN is creating their own minor league for the NFL. They pulled all of the P5 coaches together a few weeks ago, are encouraging them not to play smaller schools, and the resolution just happens to come out a few weeks later giving them more autonomy. ESPN doesn't give a crap about academics, and eventually the players will get paid. If you aren't in a power conference, you are a division 2 school because you aren't getting any money for TV and you can't afford to pay your players.
The schools want as small a number of universities in the power conferences as possible so that they don't have to split the cash. And ESPN wants the pool of universities to be as small as possible, because they only want big colleges involved that drive massive ratings.
Right now there are 5 power conferences with a total of 64 teams. We have two teams that need to join because of demographics: ND and BYU. Which of the following scenarios is most likely?
1) The schools add ND and BYU, and decide for balance that each conference should have 14 teams. So there are 70 total teams invited to the big dance.
2) The schools add ND and BYU, and decide that there should only be 4 conferences. Each conference will have 20 teams, and the conference championship game will essentially be the first round of an 8 team playoff. 80 total teams involved.
3) The schools add ND and BYU, and decide that there should be 4 conferences of 16 teams each. Either the Big 12 or the ACC is ripped apart, and 2 teams from NW, Baylor, TCU, Wake, and Vandy are dropped from the majors to the minors.
If you think that options 1 or 2 are more likely, then if you are SMU, you continue to try to invest in your sports programs and fight to get a chair before the music stops.
However, if option 3 is more likely (and I believe it is), then the dance is over and you don't have a chair. In that case, does June's idea of starting a separate league in the Spring really sound that crazy? It is the only way to have any relevance in the world of college football. There isn't going to be a bowl system anymore, and even if there is, we won't be allowed to participate in it. If they don't allow teams to play non-conference against smaller schools, they certainly aren't going to give away bowl money. So take the remaining conferences, combine them until you have 4 left, and play the same system in the Spring, except you aren't paying the players.
This all sucks, but I really get the feeling it is over. We didn't fight for relevance early enough. And if you think the NBA and ESPN aren't going to influence the same thing to happen in basketball, you are kidding yourself. Eventually, the ratings will decrease because such a small percentage of the population will have ties to those schools, and things will open back up. But it sucks for now.
The schools want as small a number of universities in the power conferences as possible so that they don't have to split the cash. And ESPN wants the pool of universities to be as small as possible, because they only want big colleges involved that drive massive ratings.
Right now there are 5 power conferences with a total of 64 teams. We have two teams that need to join because of demographics: ND and BYU. Which of the following scenarios is most likely?
1) The schools add ND and BYU, and decide for balance that each conference should have 14 teams. So there are 70 total teams invited to the big dance.
2) The schools add ND and BYU, and decide that there should only be 4 conferences. Each conference will have 20 teams, and the conference championship game will essentially be the first round of an 8 team playoff. 80 total teams involved.
3) The schools add ND and BYU, and decide that there should be 4 conferences of 16 teams each. Either the Big 12 or the ACC is ripped apart, and 2 teams from NW, Baylor, TCU, Wake, and Vandy are dropped from the majors to the minors.
If you think that options 1 or 2 are more likely, then if you are SMU, you continue to try to invest in your sports programs and fight to get a chair before the music stops.
However, if option 3 is more likely (and I believe it is), then the dance is over and you don't have a chair. In that case, does June's idea of starting a separate league in the Spring really sound that crazy? It is the only way to have any relevance in the world of college football. There isn't going to be a bowl system anymore, and even if there is, we won't be allowed to participate in it. If they don't allow teams to play non-conference against smaller schools, they certainly aren't going to give away bowl money. So take the remaining conferences, combine them until you have 4 left, and play the same system in the Spring, except you aren't paying the players.
This all sucks, but I really get the feeling it is over. We didn't fight for relevance early enough. And if you think the NBA and ESPN aren't going to influence the same thing to happen in basketball, you are kidding yourself. Eventually, the ratings will decrease because such a small percentage of the population will have ties to those schools, and things will open back up. But it sucks for now.