PonyFans.com

per Scout:

http://smu.scout.com/story/1438730-smu- ... hart?s=357

Looks like the Freshman Evan Brown did enough to crack the line up.

Pope as the #1 RB - I like that, but will still see too much of Line. Hopefully he takes a giant step forward like his brother did.

Free safety says Shakiel OR Hayden. Is Hayden not fully recovered? I figured this was his spot easily, as he was playing great before his injury.

The depth chart came from the game notes that SMU puts out:
http://grfx.cstv.com/photos/schools/smu ... elease.pdf

Greenbauer is moving around well, and says he is pretty much pain-free. Last time I talked to him, he said he is gaining confidence in his knee and is ready to play.

NastyStang wrote:Pope as the #1 RB - I like that, but will still see too much of Line. Hopefully he takes a giant step forward like his brother did.

Free safety says Shakiel OR Hayden. Is Hayden not fully recovered? I figured this was his spot easily, as he was playing great before his injury.

SR has always stood out athletically since he came on campus. He battling HG is probably more from SR stepping up than HG recovering from injury.

Darrion is the one to watch on Saturday at safety. That dude is going to be great.

My things to watch for (none of this comes from what I saw at practice):
1) How much can JR play? The number of plays he runs out there for dictates the frequency that we can play nickel, which is kind of important against a team like Baylor.

2) How do the linebackers do in coverage? We think we have good players at safety, but none of that matters if there are huge gaps in the middle of the field left by the linebackers. I'd keep a close eye on whomever plays next to Yenga in the middle.

3) Do we use 4 down linemen from time to time? Do we leverage the depth on the line or pass rushing OLBs to create a 4-down look, especially in a nickel or dime situation?

4) Do we use the improvements at safety to put an extra one on the field? Do we replace an LB with a safety from time to time to actually create a dime look (JR, AM, and HR at corner, three safeties, and two true LBs, 4 down linemen pushing Zelt inside to tackle and using Beau or EN as an end).

The improved size and depth in the secondary and d-line could use to more flexibility in the defensive schemes, which I think would have a dramatic impact and improve our rate of getting off the field on 3rd down. Will we start faking injuries at LB instead of DL in order to switch players out during the hurry up?

Do my soiree members need to be worried that acclaimed linebacker Cam Nwosu is not on the depth chart?

JasonB wrote:

NastyStang wrote:Pope as the #1 RB - I like that, but will still see too much of Line. Hopefully he takes a giant step forward like his brother did.

Free safety says Shakiel OR Hayden. Is Hayden not fully recovered? I figured this was his spot easily, as he was playing great before his injury.

SR has always stood out athletically since he came on campus. He battling HG is probably more from SR stepping up than HG recovering from injury.

Darrion is the one to watch on Saturday at safety. That dude is going to be great.

My things to watch for (none of this comes from what I saw at practice):
1) How much can JR play? The number of plays he runs out there for dictates the frequency that we can play nickel, which is kind of important against a team like Baylor.

2) How do the linebackers do in coverage? We think we have good players at safety, but none of that matters if there are huge gaps in the middle of the field left by the linebackers. I'd keep a close eye on whomever plays next to Yenga in the middle.

3) Do we use 4 down linemen from time to time? Do we leverage the depth on the line or pass rushing OLBs to create a 4-down look, especially in a nickel or dime situation?

4) Do we use the improvements at safety to put an extra one on the field? Do we replace an LB with a safety from time to time to actually create a dime look (JR, AM, and HR at corner, three safeties, and two true LBs, 4 down linemen pushing Zelt inside to tackle and using Beau or EN as an end).

The improved size and depth in the secondary and d-line could use to more flexibility in the defensive schemes, which I think would have a dramatic impact and improve our rate of getting off the field on 3rd down. Will we start faking injuries at LB instead of DL in order to switch players out during the hurry up?

this is surprisingly accurate. For once someone actually says something that remotely resembles the actual state of things...

Ironically I would have been great at the injury faking had I not gotten hurt and been unable to play

Will someone guess or project a goal line defense?

all out is still in the playbook.

JasonB wrote:all out is still in the playbook.

It has worked the 2 times Mason called it.

JasonB wrote: I'd keep a close eye on whomever plays next to Yenga in the middle.

Bordano.

Will be directly responsible for at least 3 scores. For Baylor. I'd be willing to bet money on it.

No Quarter wrote:Will someone guess or project a goal line defense?

All of Baylor's TD's will come from outside the 20.........../

Hard to project a goal line defense when you do not know what positions the other team will have on the field. Different defensive personnel if the offense lines up in 4 wide than if they go 3 tight with I formation.

Its really impressive that Evan Brown is starting at right guard, the line is not an easy place for true frosh to play at. At 6'2" and 310 he seems like he is physically ready and players coming out of the Southlake program are used to the big time, hope he turns into our next OLine draft pick.