|
If we are going to go with an older gentleman, I nominate...Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower
26 posts
• Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2
Re: If we are going to go with an older gentleman, I nominatWhat's scary is that some of you r-tards are actually serious.
Re: If we are going to go with an older gentleman, I nominatNote: Chad Morris or any of the OC under 50 we are looking at would be preferred.
Re: If we are going to go with an older gentleman, I nominatYou can't not say he wasn't the best recruiter we ever had...
Last edited by SMU1523 on Tue Sep 09, 2014 1:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: If we are going to go with an older gentleman, I nominat
Give me enough cash to pass out and I could recruit anyone I want. Do unto others before they do unto you!!
Re: If we are going to go with an older gentleman, I nominatIt's not everyday you can throw out crazy coach ideas. I am just basking in the moment.
Re: If we are going to go with an older gentleman, I nominatthey said the same thing about lb.
Re: If we are going to go with an older gentleman, I nominatWhile young, unproven, up-and-comer may be the way to go, don't count someone out because of their age. If they have the passion, drive, energy, and connection with kids we are seeking, then let's at least have an interview. I am certain 50% or more thought LB was a ridiculous hire.
Re: If we are going to go with an older gentleman, I nominatI nominate mrydel
BOP - Providing insensitivity training for a politically correct world since 1989.
Re: If we are going to go with an older gentleman, I nominatIf nominated I will not accept. If elected I will not serve.
All those who believe in psycho kinesis, raise my hand
Re: If we are going to go with an older gentleman, I nominatWhen my mom heard the news, she said, "Good! Let's hire Lou Holtz!"
Re: If we are going to go with an older gentleman, I nominat
Quite a Sherman-Woodesque response. Smustatesman aka NUKE......I procreate and I vote.
Re: If we are going to go with an older gentleman, I nominat
Here's the thing, though, we're not going to get a football equivalent of Larry Brown. The older coaches that would consider our job are either looking for a comfy job to ease into retirement or are way past their prime and willing to take any job. We need a young, energetic coach that hustles in recruiting and brings something innovative to the table on offense and defense. Some people are saying that we need someone that is going to be here for the long run. I don't agree. Where our program is right now, the only coaches that will come and plan to be here for the long run are the ones that have already proven they can't hack it at the next level. I want a guy that wants to be on the short list the next time an Alabama or Texas type job opens up. Why? Because if he can get his name on that short list, he's moved SMU up a level or two in competitiveness and makes the job even more attractive if he does leave.
Re: If we are going to go with an older gentleman, I nominat
dad-gum Atlanta burner... stable-boy for the four horsemen of the apocalypse
Re: If we are going to go with an older gentleman, I nominat
**poof** Lurk Mode Off At the risk of angering, oh, 1/2 the board... ^^THIS^^ Texas bites. Baylor sucks. As it was in the beginning, is now, and evermore shall be. Amen.
26 posts
• Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2
Who is onlineUsers browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests |
|