|
PonyFans.com •
Board Index •
Around the Hilltop •
Football •
Recruiting •
Basketball •
Other Sports
This is the forum for talk about SMU Football
Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower
by Dukie » Wed Sep 24, 2014 4:15 pm
Posting this mainly because, while the structural similarities between Cameron and Moody are well noted around here, Duke's football stadium and Ford are near twins as well, despite being built 70+ years apart, in their single-level, horseshoe layout. (At one time, Duke had a second deck that had been added, but it was torn out a long time ago.) Anyway, Duke is finally losing the outdated track around the football stadium, lowering the field to add more seating where the track has been, and -- this is the relevant part -- tearing out an early 1980s superstructure and replacing it with a really cool hybrid press box and suites building that will also have a small tier of outdoor seating attached. IMHO, it's a good way to make a single-level stadium look a little more big-time without adding a full second tier. I have how many SMU fans are behind glass at Ford, and if/when there is an updating, I hope the feasibility of an option like this is studied. http://www.goduke.com/ViewArticle.dbml? ... EM_ID=4200
-
Dukie

-
- Posts: 2271
- Joined: Fri Apr 14, 2000 3:01 am
- Location: Austin, Texas
by SMU1523 » Wed Sep 24, 2014 7:27 pm
The similarities are uncanny...
-

SMU1523

-
- Posts: 1350
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2010 9:03 pm
- Location: Dallas, TX
by AustinPerson » Wed Sep 24, 2014 7:33 pm
Are the duke posters like PF posters and calling for an expansion to 50,000 people and a second deck?
-
AustinPerson

-
- Posts: 683
- Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2011 8:29 am
- Location: Austin, TX
by Dukie » Thu Sep 25, 2014 5:09 pm
AustinPerson wrote:Are the duke posters like PF posters and calling for an expansion to 50,000 people and a second deck?
Only a couple. Hardly anyone is even calling for filling in the open end of the horseshoe. Most are sane, and having Cameron--ersus the larger, newer arenas other schools like Wake have built--has taught them that a small arena consistently full for the home team is better than a big arena that has lots of state-school visitors picking up lots of tickets. We also just had dismal turnout for Tulane, so while the ACC games will be full, there's just no need for it now. Thank goodness Cutcliffe hasn't thrown any JJ-style tantrums over poor fan support when turnout like last week's game happens.
-
Dukie

-
- Posts: 2271
- Joined: Fri Apr 14, 2000 3:01 am
- Location: Austin, Texas
by floridianstang » Fri Sep 26, 2014 9:15 am
The new stadium mockup looks a lot like Ford. Appropriate size for a private school.
-
floridianstang

-
- Posts: 710
- Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2014 4:51 am
by Digetydog » Fri Sep 26, 2014 10:44 am
floridianstang wrote:The new stadium mockup looks a lot like Ford. Appropriate size for a private school.
But it has the same problems that Ford has: 1) Too many bad seats in the endzone and the corners. 2) Open end looks bad on TV 3) Not enough good seats between the sidelines. If you want to build a cool looking 30-40K seat stadium, it should look something like this: Reebok Stadium http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Macron_Sta ... inside.jpg
Do unto others before they do unto you!!
-

Digetydog

-
- Posts: 3913
- Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2011 5:33 am
by SMU1523 » Fri Sep 26, 2014 10:58 am
Digetydog wrote:floridianstang wrote:The new stadium mockup looks a lot like Ford. Appropriate size for a private school.
But it has the same problems that Ford has: 1) Too many bad seats in the endzone and the corners. 2) Open end looks bad on TV 3) Not enough good seats between the sidelines. If you want to build a cool looking 30-40K seat stadium, it should look something like this: Reebok Stadium http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Macron_Sta ... inside.jpg
That stadium is terrible. Ford may not look great on TV, but in person or driving past it on Mockingbird it truly is a gorgeous stadium on a gorgeous campus. Duke is heading in the right direction.
-

SMU1523

-
- Posts: 1350
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2010 9:03 pm
- Location: Dallas, TX
by No Quarter » Fri Sep 26, 2014 2:37 pm
I think some of this has been answered / talked out before, but please remind.
Assume that Ford had SRO (or sitting room only on the bank behind the south goal) what could be done to increase seating without UP approval except closing the U with seats no higher than the east stands?
FTR I am old enough that travel is difficult and anyway, my ability to attend games has been only every several years. But for potential Dallas area fans not attracted to the Boulevard and not among the faithful, what effect does parking across Central, etc., have on attendance?
-
No Quarter

-
- Posts: 1509
- Joined: Sun Mar 19, 2000 4:01 am
by Stallion » Fri Sep 26, 2014 2:40 pm
every school has gone corporate/season ticket priority parking and its always gonna be tough for visitors to find parking these days. SMU's parking is EASILY closer to similar parking at A&M(3 miles), Baylor (1.5 miles), TCU (1.5 miles), Tech (1 mile)-haven't been to UT lately. All have realized that remote parking and busses can be utilized-but SMU's remote parking is much closer. Every BCS school in Texas has sold out its season tickets too so it isn't 1980 any more
Last edited by Stallion on Fri Sep 26, 2014 2:44 pm, edited 2 times in total.
"With a quarter of a tank of gas, we can get everything we need right here in DFW." -SMU Head Coach Chad Morris
When momentum starts rolling downhill in recruiting-WATCH OUT.
-
Stallion

-
- Posts: 44302
- Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2000 4:01 am
- Location: Dallas,Texas,USA
by DiamondM » Fri Sep 26, 2014 2:41 pm
The bones of the stadium and the location are great, but this is a much needed update. I always liked the fall foliage in the open end of Wallace Wade late in the season.
-
DiamondM

-
- Posts: 1623
- Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2000 4:01 am
- Location: Dallas, TX
by CalallenStang » Sat Sep 27, 2014 8:17 am
No Quarter wrote:I think some of this has been answered / talked out before, but please remind.
Assume that Ford had SRO (or sitting room only on the bank behind the south goal) what could be done to increase seating without UP approval except closing the U with seats no higher than the east stands?
FTR I am old enough that travel is difficult and anyway, my ability to attend games has been only every several years. But for potential Dallas area fans not attracted to the Boulevard and not among the faithful, what effect does parking across Central, etc., have on attendance?
Upper decks with height no higher than the top of the press box
-

CalallenStang

-
- Posts: 19359
- Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 9:43 pm
- Location: 25 feet from the Hillcrest track
by dirtysouthpony » Sat Sep 27, 2014 8:21 am
Dukie wrote:AustinPerson wrote:Are the duke posters like PF posters and calling for an expansion to 50,000 people and a second deck?
Only a couple. Hardly anyone is even calling for filling in the open end of the horseshoe. Most are sane, and having Cameron--ersus the larger, newer arenas other schools like Wake have built--has taught them that a small arena consistently full for the home team is better than a big arena that has lots of state-school visitors picking up lots of tickets. We also just had dismal turnout for Tulane, so while the ACC games will be full, there's just no need for it now. Thank goodness Cutcliffe hasn't thrown any JJ-style tantrums over poor fan support when turnout like last week's game happens.
Cutcliffe is the man! We sure do miss him at Tennessee.
-
dirtysouthpony

-
- Posts: 435
- Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2011 3:30 am
Return to Football
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 19 guests
|
|