NO SMU?
Posted: Tue Nov 11, 2014 11:51 amPage 1 of 1
Re: NO SMU?
Posted: Tue Nov 11, 2014 1:23 pmSMU students are too profit and party oriented to waste time on a pseudoscience brain exercise website
Re: NO SMU?
Posted: Tue Nov 11, 2014 3:21 pmcouch 'em wrote:SMU students are too profit and party oriented to waste time on a pseudoscience brain exercise website
No partying at UT?
Re: NO SMU?
Posted: Tue Nov 11, 2014 7:18 pmInsane_Pony_Posse wrote:couch 'em wrote:SMU students are too profit and party oriented to waste time on a pseudoscience brain exercise website
No partying at UT?
I live a stone's throw from the UT campus. The party scene is active, but my impression is that the typical UT student resembles a Rice student much more than an SMU student in terms of their social lives. They aren't, as a group, as smart as the Rice kids, but their study and past time habits are much the same.
Re: NO SMU?
Posted: Tue Nov 11, 2014 7:29 pmSure, but if 1% of students have an interest in these games you have thousands of game players. Same 1% at SMU like 50 undergrads.Insane_Pony_Posse wrote:couch 'em wrote:SMU students are too profit and party oriented to waste time on a pseudoscience brain exercise website
No partying at UT?
Plus reefer and menthols is more sedentary than coke and prescription drugs.
Re: NO SMU?
Posted: Tue Nov 11, 2014 10:11 pmSurprised to see that Richmond made the list and Sewanee was omitted.
Re: NO SMU?
Posted: Tue Nov 11, 2014 10:16 pmdirtysouthpony wrote:Surprised to see that Richmond made the list and Sewanee was omitted.
Sewanee has never been the same since he left Rich Phillips.
Re: NO SMU?
Posted: Tue Nov 11, 2014 10:27 pmmrydel wrote:dirtysouthpony wrote:Surprised to see that Richmond made the list and Sewanee was omitted.
Sewanee has never been the same since he left Rich Phillips.
That 99 Sewanee team was mighty good