Page 1 of 2
Students - WSJ

Posted:
Fri Jul 17, 2015 6:05 pm
by GiddyUp
Re: Students - WSJ

Posted:
Fri Jul 17, 2015 8:57 pm
by No Quarter
So maybe SMU students are way out in front?
I wonder what studies show about students at BB games.
Re: Students - WSJ

Posted:
Fri Jul 17, 2015 10:21 pm
by Fresno Mustang
I think a lot of it is where student sections are located within stadiums (which stems from conference rules on student section location.) But, in the age of the 70 inch high def flat screen TV, why would a student:
A) Sit in the corner of the stadium, crammed with other students, and have bad seats
B) Have to wait in line for a student ticket
C) not be served alcohol
D) Have to sit in extremely hot or cold weather
Or, you can avoid all of that and watch the game at home or a bar in front of a nice TV and be able to watch the game closer and have commentary.
Its the same problem with the NFL. Why spend $1K or more on tickets, parking, etc. when I can watch on a nice tv, check my fantasy team, not pay $24 for a slice of pizza, not have the drunk opposing fan try to fight me and cuss around my family, etc.
For the record, I still thnk going to the game is enjoyable. Especially if you go to a school that has a major home field advantage, which makes it even more fun. But if you're not a "diehard" fan like myself, watching on TV isn't a bad option at all in the eyes of a lot of students.
Re: Students - WSJ

Posted:
Fri Jul 17, 2015 10:47 pm
by Pony Boss
SMU Football is an inferior product to SMU Basketball as of 2014-15 season. If SMU Football improves, expect it to be full as Moody is
Re: Students - WSJ

Posted:
Sat Jul 18, 2015 8:26 am
by 82Pony
I see this all the time, but don't you think if the football stadium held 7k it would be full every game? Conversely, try getting 30k to a basketball game.
Re: Students - WSJ

Posted:
Sat Jul 18, 2015 10:12 am
by Pony Boss
I meant proportionately man
Re: Students - WSJ

Posted:
Sat Jul 18, 2015 10:31 am
by RGV Pony
Yeah cmon man
Re: Students - WSJ

Posted:
Sat Jul 18, 2015 10:33 am
by malonish
Man
Re: Students - WSJ

Posted:
Sat Jul 18, 2015 10:38 am
by West Coast Johnny
One thing colleges can do is to start scheduling good games. There are only six or seven home games in a season and one of them is usually a scrimmage against a FCS team.
The other issue that is killing attendance is that TV sets the game times. Sorry, I don't want to bake in the sun in 104 degree temperatures for a 2:30 kickoff just because it fits in with Fox Sports TV schedule.
Re: Students - WSJ

Posted:
Sat Jul 18, 2015 11:42 am
by mrydel
But you have such a nice concourse.
Re: Students - WSJ

Posted:
Mon Jul 20, 2015 2:18 pm
by RednBlue11
get me AC, a retractable roof/shade, easy access to stimulants/food and i'll be there for the whole game
Re: Students - WSJ

Posted:
Mon Jul 20, 2015 2:20 pm
by RednBlue11
BTW, alumni reaction to this post

Re: Students - WSJ

Posted:
Mon Jul 20, 2015 3:52 pm
by ponyboys
Starting time definitely impact attendance of students and TV sets the starting times. Not sure how you get around it at this point. Winning and a football culture has an obvious impact and I don't see that mentioned but students want to be around a winning team. Some areas of the country football is a way of life other places it is one more distraction. I think there may be tough times ahead for the sold out stadiums unless everyone gets a luxury box with a tv.
Re: Students - WSJ

Posted:
Mon Jul 20, 2015 4:31 pm
by mrydel
RednBlue11 wrote:BTW, alumni reaction to this post

That's my son.
Re: Students - WSJ

Posted:
Tue Jul 21, 2015 5:28 pm
by aus10fromhous10
I gotta wonder if they're perhaps misinterpreting the data regarding cell phone reception. Couldn't the reason that respondents rank it as a low priority be because there's an underlying expectation that cell service should be plentiful anywhere you go?