PonyFans.com

Best wishes to Deion Jr. (CB), Ced Lancaster (CB), and Bo (DL) on their new positions. I think they will do well.

we can only hope

If we're down to Deion & Ced at corners, fuggetaboutit, it's over! Tulsa one of the best offenses around, with 2 of the best receivers in the AAC.

You can say that again

Funny how great Tulsa's offense is with the exact same type of players we have. Yet they don't come up with new excuses every week for their lightly recruited, slow, crappy players, with few offers. Montgomery took his exact same guys from last year and made them great with coaching and scheme alone!

Yeah, but, but, but, but......

If we're down to Deion & Ced at corners, fuggetaboutit, it's over! Tulsa one of the best offenses around, with 2 of the best receivers in the AAC.

footballdad wrote:Funny how great Tulsa's offense is with the exact same type of players we have. Yet they don't come up with new excuses every week for their lightly recruited, slow, crappy players, with few offers. Montgomery took his exact same guys from last year and made them great with coaching and scheme alone!

Yeah, but, but, but, but......

Translation: Montgomery>Morris

Tulsa hung 38 points on us last year and that President kid looks like he is going to cause AAC defenses fits before he's done. Impact player as a true FR. I think Mack Brown said Baylor offered him as a WR but Tulsa giving hi a shot as dual threat QB

sbsmith wrote:

footballdad wrote:Funny how great Tulsa's offense is with the exact same type of players we have. Yet they don't come up with new excuses every week for their lightly recruited, slow, crappy players, with few offers. Montgomery took his exact same guys from last year and made them great with coaching and scheme alone!

Yeah, but, but, but, but......

Translation: Montgomery>Morris

Your translation maybe, not mine.

My translation: Excuses are lies wrapped up in reasons.

footballdad wrote:Your translation maybe, not mine.

My translation: Excuses are lies wrapped up in reasons.

Should we have hired Montgomery instead? You seem pretty impressed with him.

sbsmith wrote:

footballdad wrote:Your translation maybe, not mine.

My translation: Excuses are lies wrapped up in reasons.

Should we have hired Montgomery instead? You seem pretty impressed with him.

And you're not? Offensively, he seems to be getting a lot more out of his crappy talent, than we're getting out of ours.

Chad was a great hire.

SMU averaged 7 points per game in the first 7 games of 2014. Everybody in the Country has been impressed with the offensive improvement at SMU. This year we've about quadrupled the scoring

I think Tulsa best us last year.

footballdad wrote:And you're not? Offensively, he seems to be getting a lot more out of his crappy talent, than we're getting out of ours.

Chad was a great hire.

Tulsa
24.7 ppg to 34.6 ppg (+9.9)
412.5 ypg to 548.1 ypg (+135.6)


SMU
11.1 ppg to 28.4 ppg (+17.3)
269 ypg to 415.4 (+146.4)



Common opponents

Tulsa vs ECU 17 points 463 yards
SMU vs ECU 23 points 329 yards

Tulsa vs Houston 24 points 456 yards
SMU vs Houston 28 points 399 yards

Head to head this week.

No talent on either team, very few offers, 2 terrible defenses, rookie coaches. Should be a toss up.

Let's see what happens.