Page 1 of 1

PI on second end zone INT?

PostPosted: Sun Sep 18, 2016 12:01 pm
by Junior
Was there a pass inteference on the second interception that Hicks through in the end zone? It looked like the receiver got the crap knocked out of him while the ball was on the way there, but nothing was called. I never saw a replay, but this is what it look like from the stands.

Re: PI on second end zone INT?

PostPosted: Sun Sep 18, 2016 12:06 pm
by mrydel
Quick replay I saw looked like the receiver broke right and the throw went left. Received ran into a defender. If that is what happened I do not know if the throw or the receiver made the wrong read.

Re: PI on second end zone INT?

PostPosted: Sun Sep 18, 2016 12:10 pm
by Junior
mrydel wrote:Quick replay I saw looked like the receiver broke right and the throw went left. Received ran into a defender. If that is what happened I do not know if the throw or the receiver made the wrong read.

Thanks, Mark. That may have been the case. The player looked like he got blasted from my vantage point, but I may have had a bad angle.

Re: PI on second end zone INT?

PostPosted: Sun Sep 18, 2016 12:12 pm
by mrydel
He was hit hard. I could not see it from my seats but saw a replay this morning on a highlight tape.

Re: PI on second end zone INT?

PostPosted: Sun Sep 18, 2016 6:24 pm
by PonyPlayer4
Watching it live, I thought it was 100% PI. No replay was shown in the stadium.

Re: PI on second end zone INT?

PostPosted: Sun Sep 18, 2016 6:31 pm
by Stallion
I did too but after watching on replay I'm less sure unless Walker was planning a back shoulder move-he may have just run wrong route because he went right and the ball went left. Still think that would routinely be called Pass Interference since the Official isn't supposed to assume that a receiver couldn't catch it

Re: PI on second end zone INT?

PostPosted: Sun Sep 18, 2016 7:19 pm
by mrydel
But I think the ball had passed him before he was hit.

Re: PI on second end zone INT?

PostPosted: Sun Sep 18, 2016 8:43 pm
by JasonB
I thought it was PI for sure until I watched the replay. I can understand the no call. It wasn't catchable by a receiver because the receiver was running the opposite direction and the ball was thrown 5 yards behind him. Someone read the play wrong, or Hicks was actually trying to throw to the corner and didn't see the defender there because of the inside receiver's position.