|
PonyFans.com •
Board Index •
Around the Hilltop •
Football •
Recruiting •
Basketball •
Other Sports
This is the forum for talk about SMU Football
Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower
by Rebel10 » Sun Oct 02, 2016 8:27 am
Other than Ohio State it looks like the Tulsa offense is averaging about 50 a game. Definitely not an automatic win. Maybe the short week will do SMU good because the team has to forget the Temple loss quickly and move on to this game.
#HammerDown
-
Rebel10

-
- Posts: 12534
- Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2009 10:20 pm
by sbsmith » Sun Oct 02, 2016 9:33 am
They had a bye this past week
They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty or security
-Benjamin Franklin
-
sbsmith

-
- Posts: 9540
- Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2008 11:21 am
- Location: Dallas
by Lebanese4Life » Sun Oct 02, 2016 10:36 am
Rebel10 wrote:Other than Ohio State it looks like the Tulsa offense is averaging about 50 a game. Definitely not an automatic win. Maybe the short week will do SMU good because the team has to forget the Temple loss quickly and move on to this game.
"automatic win" lol. Please point out ONE fan who thinks this is an automatic win for SMU
-
Lebanese4Life

-
- Posts: 2937
- Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2008 1:58 am
- Location: Kuwait
by Pony Boss » Sun Oct 02, 2016 10:41 am
There arent automatic wins at this stage of the rebuild.
-

Pony Boss

-
- Posts: 2411
- Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2014 11:22 pm
by footballdad » Sun Oct 02, 2016 10:55 am
Lebanese4Life wrote:Rebel10 wrote:Other than Ohio State it looks like the Tulsa offense is averaging about 50 a game. Definitely not an automatic win. Maybe the short week will do SMU good because the team has to forget the Temple loss quickly and move on to this game.
"automatic win" lol. Please point out ONE fan who thinks this is an automatic win for SMU
Exactly. This is the real game to measure where SMU is as a team, not the Temple game. Tulsa was a struggling team prior to Montgomery's arrival. 2 and 3 wins the previous 2 years. Montgomery showed up the same year as Morris. Tulsa is not bigger, stronger, or faster than SMU (Rebel10's favorite excuse). SMU has recruited better the last 2 years. Fans are apathetic in Tulsa as well. Facilities about the same. Montgomery somehow figured out how to win 6 games his first year. This game should be an even contest and a barometer of progress. What will the excuses be this week, if things don't go well? (Injuries, bigger/faster/stronger, just need 2 more recruiting classes, next year.......) Maybe Montgomery is the real offensive guru, with the more immediate P5 coaching future?
-
footballdad

-
- Posts: 2356
- Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2014 5:42 pm
by Pony Boss » Sun Oct 02, 2016 11:05 am
First time I agree with fbdad...
-

Pony Boss

-
- Posts: 2411
- Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2014 11:22 pm
by Charleston Pony » Sun Oct 02, 2016 12:58 pm
Tulsa might not be Temple, but they do have a Sr QB and upper class guys at skill positions so they will have a significant edge experience wise. I expect us to be more competitive, but this is not a game I expect our guys to have any chance of winning. Eventually our team will prove me wrong, but I'm still just hoping for year over year improvement which for me means 3-4 wins this year and no 63-0 losses.
-
Charleston Pony

-
- Posts: 28923
- Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2000 3:01 am
- Location: Stonebridge Golf Club, NC
by 78pony » Sun Oct 02, 2016 7:07 pm
footballdad wrote:Lebanese4Life wrote:Rebel10 wrote:Other than Ohio State it looks like the Tulsa offense is averaging about 50 a game. Definitely not an automatic win. Maybe the short week will do SMU good because the team has to forget the Temple loss quickly and move on to this game.
"automatic win" lol. Please point out ONE fan who thinks this is an automatic win for SMU
Exactly. This is the real game to measure where SMU is as a team, not the Temple game. Tulsa was a struggling team prior to Montgomery's arrival. 2 and 3 wins the previous 2 years. Montgomery showed up the same year as Morris. Tulsa is not bigger, stronger, or faster than SMU (Rebel10's favorite excuse). SMU has recruited better the last 2 years. Fans are apathetic in Tulsa as well. Facilities about the same. Montgomery somehow figured out how to win 6 games his first year. This game should be an even contest and a barometer of progress. What will the excuses be this week, if things don't go well? (Injuries, bigger/faster/stronger, just need 2 more recruiting classes, next year.......) Maybe Montgomery is the real offensive guru, with the more immediate P5 coaching future?
You sir just nailed it!
-
78pony

-
- Posts: 1243
- Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2003 3:01 am
- Location: Dallas, TX
by Rebel10 » Sun Oct 02, 2016 7:40 pm
Lebanese4Life wrote:Rebel10 wrote:Other than Ohio State it looks like the Tulsa offense is averaging about 50 a game. Definitely not an automatic win. Maybe the short week will do SMU good because the team has to forget the Temple loss quickly and move on to this game.
"automatic win" lol. Please point out ONE fan who thinks this is an automatic win for SMU
Someone who I will not name said that we will beat Liberty, Tulsa and Tulane.
#HammerDown
-
Rebel10

-
- Posts: 12534
- Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2009 10:20 pm
by Rebel10 » Tue Oct 04, 2016 5:55 am
sbsmith wrote:They had a bye this past week
I was referring to the fact that SMU had a short week this week so that they would have to quickly forget about the Temple loss.
#HammerDown
-
Rebel10

-
- Posts: 12534
- Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2009 10:20 pm
by mtrout » Tue Oct 04, 2016 7:59 am
Tulsa -17
-
mtrout

-
- Posts: 2314
- Joined: Thu Feb 18, 2016 9:36 pm
by Junior » Tue Oct 04, 2016 11:03 am
Pony Boss wrote:There arent automatic wins at this stage of the rebuild.
not for us at least...
Derail the Frogs!
-

Junior

-
- Posts: 11513
- Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2006 11:56 am
- Location: Dallas, TX
by GoMustAAngs2007 » Tue Oct 04, 2016 12:26 pm
Junior wrote:Pony Boss wrote:There arent automatic wins at this stage of the rebuild.
not for us at least...
At no time in the 10+ years that I have followed SMU football have I considered any game an automatic win.
-
GoMustAAngs2007

-
- Posts: 181
- Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2006 11:52 pm
- Location: Dallas, TX
by shadowman » Tue Oct 04, 2016 12:49 pm
GoMustAAngs2007 wrote:Junior wrote:Pony Boss wrote:There arent automatic wins at this stage of the rebuild.
not for us at least...
At no time in the 10+ years that I have followed SMU football have I considered any game an automatic win.
Only time I have thought a game to be an automatic win is when we play an FCS team like Liberty or James Madi... oops, never mind.
Probaly won't happen...BUT...maybe it will!!
-

shadowman

-
- Posts: 2204
- Joined: Wed Jul 23, 2003 3:01 am
- Location: Dallas
by Comet » Tue Oct 04, 2016 1:11 pm
lol at Tulsa being an automatic win. We are playing too many young ones and are too battered up to consider anyone an automatic win. I'd be happy if we win 2 more, but am only expecting one more win.
-

Comet

-
- Posts: 2392
- Joined: Fri Dec 03, 2010 7:00 pm
- Location: Plano
Return to Football
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 8 guests
|
|