gostangs wrote:Yes - because he has raised more money for us in all areas than almost any president in the country, and advanced our university in countless ways.
Don't be stupid.
Two things
1) Just as I support term limits on US Presidents, I also suspect it's in the best interest of universities to churn them as well.
2) As for his raising $$$, many moons ago I had a Finance professor at Cox named Art Patton who predicted SMU would rocket-launch its profile over the upcoming decades due to its wealthy alumni getting older, so I think its a little tricky to gauge how successful RGT has been at fundraising. No doubt he's been good, really don't know if I would call him elite.
He clearly was late to the party in regards to athletics, I also wonder if he is too nice a guy and not demanding enough on some of his deans. Regardless, I simply think 20+ years of a Presidency is enough.