SMU and The Death Penalty/DMN

Will we ever let SMU live down its death penalty?
12:19 AM CST on Wednesday, March 10, 2004
By HENRY TATUM / The Dallas Morning News
Southern Methodist University officials must wonder how many more times their school's name and the words "death penalty" will appear in news stories this year.
These are nasty times for colleges' athletic recruiting. Universities are finding new and even more horrific ways to violate the National Collegiate Athletic Association's rules.
Illegal payments and new cars are old hat. Booze-filled sex parties and covered-up allegations of sexual assault are the order of the day.
When Baylor University's basketball program was laid bare by charges that emerged following the murder of a player, the public assumed that the stench surrounding college athletics couldn't get any worse. The public was wrong.
The University of Colorado appears to have raised the bar with seven allegations of rape involving Colorado football players since 1997. As recently as January, football players at the school hired strippers to perform at recruiting parties.
As sports columnists and editorial writers search for a punishment that would fit the level of the offenses, the death penalty inevitably comes to mind. And that invariably leads them back to SMU, the only university that was forced to shut down its football program for repeated NCAA recruiting violations.
SMU has become another one of the victims in this assault on the public's senses. A school that has kept its nose clean for the better part of two decades is having to relive its darkest moments.
Make no mistake. The Mustangs' football program dug its own grave in the 1980s. Nationally ranked high school players who normally would go to Texas, Oklahoma or Southern Cal were signing on the dotted line with SMU.
Suddenly, the private university in the Park Cities was the hottest stop on the recruiting tour. And no one ever bothered to ask why.
At least no one did until other universities that were losing top stars to the Mustangs turned them in to the NCAA. The violations were easy to find. Overzealous alums and SMU fans were providing wheels and paying athletes.
It was the last straw for NCAA officials, who already had placed SMU on probation several times. The NCAA shut down the football program for one year in 1987 – a penalty that the university extended to two years.
That's the easy story for sports writers to recite, as they discuss what needs to happen at Colorado. Lost in the headlines and quick reference is any mention of what SMU did to restore respect to its athletic programs.
Today, the university has some of the toughest entrance requirements anywhere for those receiving athletic scholarships.
SMU turned away one of the nation's top high school basketball players years ago because the university president wasn't convinced the player's entrance exam scores were accurate.
And when an assistant football coach was caught having someone else take a test for a recruit in the only misstep since the death penalty, SMU fired him immediately and imposed tough sanctions on itself.
The price for such vigilance has been a high one for the university. SMU has excelled in some sports but has had only one winning football season since the death penalty. The team lost every game last season.
So there is good reason for SMU officials to feel sensitive about the death penalty references.
The biggest question for me is why this is the only college athletic program to receive such severe punishment. Given what we know about cheating in university sports, it boggles my mind that the ax hasn't fallen on another school since 1987.
Many schools have committed offenses that were worse than those occurring at SMU in the 1980s. But their programs kept chugging along after comparative slaps on the wrist.
NCAA officials made it a point to say the death penalty handed SMU should be fair warning to other universities. But such warnings are meaningless when there is no follow-through.
SMU should feel some bitterness about its past being dredged up amid the current scandals. But the NCAA should feel embarrassed that recruiting violations have become worse since the day that the ultimate punishment was handed down.
Henry Tatum is an assistant editorial page editor of The Dallas Morning News. His e-mail address is [email protected].
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Online at: http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent ... 98533.html
12:19 AM CST on Wednesday, March 10, 2004
By HENRY TATUM / The Dallas Morning News
Southern Methodist University officials must wonder how many more times their school's name and the words "death penalty" will appear in news stories this year.
These are nasty times for colleges' athletic recruiting. Universities are finding new and even more horrific ways to violate the National Collegiate Athletic Association's rules.
Illegal payments and new cars are old hat. Booze-filled sex parties and covered-up allegations of sexual assault are the order of the day.
When Baylor University's basketball program was laid bare by charges that emerged following the murder of a player, the public assumed that the stench surrounding college athletics couldn't get any worse. The public was wrong.
The University of Colorado appears to have raised the bar with seven allegations of rape involving Colorado football players since 1997. As recently as January, football players at the school hired strippers to perform at recruiting parties.
As sports columnists and editorial writers search for a punishment that would fit the level of the offenses, the death penalty inevitably comes to mind. And that invariably leads them back to SMU, the only university that was forced to shut down its football program for repeated NCAA recruiting violations.
SMU has become another one of the victims in this assault on the public's senses. A school that has kept its nose clean for the better part of two decades is having to relive its darkest moments.
Make no mistake. The Mustangs' football program dug its own grave in the 1980s. Nationally ranked high school players who normally would go to Texas, Oklahoma or Southern Cal were signing on the dotted line with SMU.
Suddenly, the private university in the Park Cities was the hottest stop on the recruiting tour. And no one ever bothered to ask why.
At least no one did until other universities that were losing top stars to the Mustangs turned them in to the NCAA. The violations were easy to find. Overzealous alums and SMU fans were providing wheels and paying athletes.
It was the last straw for NCAA officials, who already had placed SMU on probation several times. The NCAA shut down the football program for one year in 1987 – a penalty that the university extended to two years.
That's the easy story for sports writers to recite, as they discuss what needs to happen at Colorado. Lost in the headlines and quick reference is any mention of what SMU did to restore respect to its athletic programs.
Today, the university has some of the toughest entrance requirements anywhere for those receiving athletic scholarships.
SMU turned away one of the nation's top high school basketball players years ago because the university president wasn't convinced the player's entrance exam scores were accurate.
And when an assistant football coach was caught having someone else take a test for a recruit in the only misstep since the death penalty, SMU fired him immediately and imposed tough sanctions on itself.
The price for such vigilance has been a high one for the university. SMU has excelled in some sports but has had only one winning football season since the death penalty. The team lost every game last season.
So there is good reason for SMU officials to feel sensitive about the death penalty references.
The biggest question for me is why this is the only college athletic program to receive such severe punishment. Given what we know about cheating in university sports, it boggles my mind that the ax hasn't fallen on another school since 1987.
Many schools have committed offenses that were worse than those occurring at SMU in the 1980s. But their programs kept chugging along after comparative slaps on the wrist.
NCAA officials made it a point to say the death penalty handed SMU should be fair warning to other universities. But such warnings are meaningless when there is no follow-through.
SMU should feel some bitterness about its past being dredged up amid the current scandals. But the NCAA should feel embarrassed that recruiting violations have become worse since the day that the ultimate punishment was handed down.
Henry Tatum is an assistant editorial page editor of The Dallas Morning News. His e-mail address is [email protected].
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Online at: http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent ... 98533.html