This just in...
Posted: Thu Jun 10, 2004 3:13 pmI saw it this morning, they always do the most in-depth report of any site on the web...a must read for any pony fan.
GO 'Stangs!
Page 1 of 1
Posted: Thu Jun 10, 2004 3:13 pmPosted: Thu Jun 10, 2004 4:06 pmCan SMU be Tulsa?
Posted: Thu Jun 10, 2004 4:34 pmWhat a great comparison to ask if SMU can turn it around like Tulsa! If we can't, then it must be the coaching.
Re:
Posted: Thu Jun 10, 2004 6:27 pmCurrent STUDent wrote:.... they always do the most in-depth report of any site on the web....
Except this site, of course!
Posted: Fri Jun 11, 2004 4:27 pmTouche.
Posted: Fri Jun 11, 2004 4:42 pmPlease God O Please God Let Us Win A Game!
What price, Mustang35SMU?
Posted: Fri Jun 11, 2004 5:32 pmIf your prayers for a victory are not answered, would you consider selling your soul to the devil (he wears purple and has horns like a frog)? Sometimes I think I've already lost my religion following such a losing team. Never fear, have faith, blah, blah, blah.
Posted: Fri Jun 11, 2004 5:48 pmNo No No Never Could Do That 
Posted: Sun Jun 13, 2004 11:05 amCouple of things jump out at me.
A) In the player profile, it says Allan Adami's 265. Last I heard, he was nearly 280. Hopefully he can stay at the heavier weight.
B) The three "fun facts" -- (1) First-half scoring: opponents 209, SMU 63; (2) Sacks: Opponents 41, SMU 12; (3) Fumbles: SMU 18/11 lost, opponents 8/3 lost -- aren't much fun at all.
Those numbers need to change this year. Dramatically.
A) In the player profile, it says Allan Adami's 265. Last I heard, he was nearly 280. Hopefully he can stay at the heavier weight.
B) The three "fun facts" -- (1) First-half scoring: opponents 209, SMU 63; (2) Sacks: Opponents 41, SMU 12; (3) Fumbles: SMU 18/11 lost, opponents 8/3 lost -- aren't much fun at all.
Those numbers need to change this year. Dramatically.
Posted: Sun Jun 13, 2004 3:45 pmNo they dont NEED to change they HAVE TO
Posted: Sun Jun 13, 2004 3:47 pmIsn't that the same thing?