Page 1 of 1
\"Arizona Leaving the PAC10?\" TOTALLY BIZARRE!!!
Posted:
Thu Sep 27, 2001 4:45 pmby NavyCrimson
<A HREF="http://www.tucsoncitizen.com/local/9_26_01regents.html" TARGET=_blank>http://www.tucsoncitizen.com/local/9_26_01regents.html</A>
u have got to read this - only a guy from calif. would head this up - but then again, on 'some' certain issues brought out re/ salaries & graduation rates it really has gotten crazy!
[This message has been edited by Navy&Crimson (edited 09-27-2001).]
Re: \"Arizona Leaving the PAC10?\" TOTALLY BIZARRE!!!
Posted:
Fri Sep 28, 2001 6:58 pmby smu'06
Let's hope this doesn't spark a trend
Re: \"Arizona Leaving the PAC10?\" TOTALLY BIZARRE!!!
Posted:
Mon Oct 01, 2001 10:33 amby BUS
We must have spoken about this 15 years ago. We do not pay coaches, give athletes special treatment and we graduate at a rate of 83 or 84 %.
I would give up some Grad % for more W's.
Say 65% grad and 7 and 4
Re: \"Arizona Leaving the PAC10?\" TOTALLY BIZARRE!!!
Posted:
Mon Oct 01, 2001 12:23 pmby No Quarter
Along the same lines, and surely published before on this or the other board, what is the graduation rate at SMU for full time day students NOT on athletic scholarship?
Is it lower or higher than for football players and other athletes?
Finally, what percent of full time day SMU students receiving some form of financial aid OTHER than athletic scholarship, and what is their graduation rate? Is it higher or lower than for similar full pay students?