|
SMU lands first 2012 commitmentModerators: PonyPride, SmooPower
43 posts
• Page 3 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
Re: SMU lands first 2012 commitmentLewis listed as 3* on Scout.
Go Ponies!!
Beat whoever it is we are playing!! @PonyGrad
Re: SMU lands first 2012 commitmentWe have had many other recruits who have decided to come to SMU despite having BCS offers. No, they are not in the "150" or "250" or any other numerical ranking but are still great players who have decided to come to a small, private, non-AQ school over the "big boys."
Take for example Conner Preston. Not a "150" or "250" etc. But still chose us over Colorado, Cincinnati, Maryland, etc. How is that not a national recruiting battle?? Snuffers cheese fries
Re: SMU lands first 2012 commitmentThe Pony Grad is right. The more SMU wins and the better our reputation becomes the easier recruiting will be.
Re: SMU lands first 2012 commitmentMaybe i'm not being clear on my point so I'll try again. We have not had a competition for one of the top athletes yet (ie espn 150). I do not view a good player like preston, dontae, or moreland as being in the same situation as a player in the 150 would be. For instance these players can come to SMU with the understanding that they will be the jewels in the class. What does that mean? it means the fans and coaches are excited for them. This means they will be given every oppertunity and will likely suceseed as they are the best players going into the competition for starting spots. If one of these players went to one of the places they had BCS offers to they would be the also rands of the recruiting class and up against tougher competition for playing time even at non BCS powers like MD and CO. For instance would preston have a realistic shot of climbing the depth chart at a school that every year has a legitamate chance to get the best HS QB in the country? So while these type of players are good and could possibly excell at the larger schools SMU is a safer pick for them because they will be given every oppertunity to make it. At larger schools they will not be given this oppertunity and hence SMU is a more attractive school and can beat the bigger schools. Now lets raise the calabre player to and ESPN 150, each of the 150 is expected to have an impact on then highest levels of College football ie being a starter at least by their Junior or senoir season at the top football powers in the country. Thus they get the bonus of being the recruit players and coaches are excited about having and ae given every oppertunity, not to mention the risk of recruiting a superior player at their position still exists but is less likely. For these types of Players they will be considered a big Fish in a Small pond wherever they go eliminating the biggest advantage SMU can offer to higher talented guys. I mean if you are told you have a real chance of being a 3 year starter at UT are you going to take that or the assurance of being a 3 year starter at SMU? SMU has not had that battle yet which wasmy origional point, and until they do and we win I won't be opptamisitc about our chances. Why? becuase this is how every top 15 program remains a top 15 program over the long term they win these battles. Why do they win they can say things SMU can't like national tv every week, at least 3 or 4 guys into the NFL every year, 100k people in the stadium, ect ect.
Schools like TCU and Boise still don't win these battles and likely never will until they get into the major conferences, what they do is get good players that want to be jewles of their class and out coach their opponents in all phases of the game. I think we have that level of coaching to follow this model but we won't be in a position to sign the biggest prospects. If i turn out to be incorrect about SMU ability to get top players that's great, but I don't think that is how our success will come about
SMU lands first 2012 commitmentCould you try one more time I didn't get it lol.
Also keep in mind prospective student athletes that are of the 4 star caliber will not only shine at SMU but will glisten in CUSA.
Re: SMU lands first 2012 commitmentLet me see, there are 64, give or take, BCS schools. So if you are not in the top 150, avg 2.5 approx. players per BCS school, then you are an also ran??? That is soooo wrong.
Go Ponies!!
Beat whoever it is we are playing!! @PonyGrad
SMU lands first 2012 commitmentShine and glisten? Only if they hang out at the Spearmint Rhino!
![]() I know right? Makes you wonder if I'm going to break dance to show tunes! Lol
Re: SMU lands first 2012 commitmentI applaud OTP on his post. Shine & glisten indeed.
Re: SMU lands first 2012 commitmentthere's about 400 guys in espn's top 150 watch list. let's see what happens, where he ends up, who else wants him, and who we are battling to keep the guy. either way, a great pick up so early in the season
Re: SMU lands first 2012 commitment
http://espn.go.com/college-football/rec ... class/2007 #143 ? WEST DIVISION CHAMPS 2010
SMU lands first 2012 commitment
Well played. Derail the Frogs!
Re: SMU lands first 2012 commitment
Oregon has offered him and he still has not budged from SMU. And Colorado has offer as well. I think Coach Klemm really did well in identifying him early and building the relationship with Robert and his family. Nice job Coach Klemm. "We will play man to man and we will pick you up at the airport." - Larry Brown
________________________Champion________________________ ![]()
Re: SMU lands first 2012 commitmentThis kid is going to be money in the CUSA.
Pay Lashlee more money
43 posts
• Page 3 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
Who is onlineUsers browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests |
|