SMU First To Offer Allen QB Nathan [deleted]

by **Danny Noonan** » Thu Mar 09, 2006 3:11 pm

At least we don't have it as bad as Arkansas does. Casey replaced Robert Johnson as the starter this year against South Carolina and the potential headlines were endless. My favorite:

Nutt pulls Johnson out, inserts [deleted] against C0cks.

For anyone who thinks this will affect his recruiting, get a sense of humor. I'm sure he's heard it from day one. The only thing you can do is laugh about. We're not the only school that thinks the name [deleted] is funny.

by **jtstang** » Thu Mar 09, 2006 3:22 pm

Danny, that has got to go on one of those lists of things that sound dirty, but aren't. Now, be the ball. Nanananananananananananana.....

by **EastStang** » Thu Mar 09, 2006 4:38 pm

Hopefully his middle name's not Harry.

by **SMU Football Blog** » Thu Mar 09, 2006 5:45 pm

jtstang wrote:
Hoofprint wrote:I believe we were.

Hopefully the QB corral at Arkansas is crowded and he doesn't choose to follow his brother to Fayetteville.

Surely that town's not big enough for two Dicks.

Sorry. Couldn't help myself.

Ratchet it down a notch.

SMU's student population is 56% women. And that is considered a problem among college administrators around the country and they are trying to acheive a 1:1 ratio of men to women in the student body. Therefore, given the disproportionate number of women at SMU, I think there is plenty of room for ..., well, you know.

by **KnuckleStang** » Thu Mar 09, 2006 10:38 pm

For the love of all that is holy -- THINK OF THE CHILDREN!

by **Ponymon** » Thu Mar 09, 2006 10:55 pm

Danny Noonan wrote:We're not the only school that thinks the name [deleted] is funny.

Let's see Danny ryhmes with Fanny. Ha! HA! HA!

Grow Up!

by **abezontar** » Thu Mar 09, 2006 10:58 pm

Why is having slightly more women on campus then men bad? I liked the ratio quite a bit as an undergrad.

by **Ponymon** » Thu Mar 09, 2006 11:04 pm

I agree abezontar. I would think that it would be a real positive :!:

by PK » Fri Mar 10, 2006 12:16 am

abezontar wrote:Why is having slightly more women on campus then men bad? I liked the ratio quite a bit as an undergrad.

Well...Title IX for one. Gender ratio of the student population has a direct bearing on Title IX requirements.

by **DallasDiehard** » Sun Mar 26, 2006 5:33 pm

Nathan was at the scrimmage yesterday, along with about a half a dozen guys who looked like they might be his teammates.

I also saw a guy who was wearing a Carter Cowboys shirt .... I overheard him say something about being the "leading rusher" -- don't know if he meant last year, or that's his plan for 2006, or what. By my eyeball assessment, I would guess he was around 5-10, 180 or 190. Anyone know anything about Carter's RBs (If, in fact, that's what he plays....)?

by **Pony Fan** » Sun Mar 26, 2006 5:52 pm

How about Michael Hicks?

by **DallasDiehard** » Sun Mar 26, 2006 6:05 pm

That's him. Pretty solid looking guy.

Rivals is listing his early choices as:
LSU, Oklahoma, Alabama, Kansas State, Oklahoma State, Texas A&M and UTEP, in addition to SMU. Claims high interest in LSU and Oklahoma, medium interest in the rest.

by **Pony4Life** » Mon Mar 27, 2006 12:13 am

Maybe I'm way off, but if DeMyron Martin has a huge year (which I expect him to!), couldn't that help with the recruitment of more Allen HS players?

by **GoRedGoBlue** » Mon Mar 27, 2006 9:31 am

Let's put it this way...

If we WIN, they (he or others) will come.

8-4 or we are screwed

by **OC Mustang** » Mon Mar 27, 2006 10:55 am

9 wins should be the bogie. Not a prediction; is goal. 9 wins.
We get into bowl with less; however, 9 wins gives us recruiting credibility.
Would I like 12 wins? Sure. But the bare minimum is 9 wins.

SMU First To Offer Allen QB Nathan [deleted]

Who is online