Lets go ahead and give the Iron Skillet back.

by **me@smu** » Fri Apr 14, 2006 8:44 am

Stallion wrote: I don't know what kind of claim to superiority of are seeking based on recruiting but obviously you like to make a fool of yourself.

Who is claiming superiority...my statement is that those were the type of players TCU had when we won last year is factual. I realize being a lawyer you might have trouble understanding what a fact is, but throwing out a bunch of information available to any third grader with a computer doesn't make my statement any less true. We won last year.

by **jtstang** » Fri Apr 14, 2006 8:48 am

me@smu wrote:Who is claiming superiority...my statement is that those were the type of players TCU had when we won last year is factual. I realize being a lawyer you might have trouble understanding what a fact is, but throwing out a bunch of information available to any third grader with a computer doesn't make my statement any less true. We won last year.

Psst... Does the term "blind squirrel" mean anything to you?

by **mrydel** » Fri Apr 14, 2006 9:21 am

jtstang wrote:
me@smu wrote:Who is claiming superiority...my statement is that those were the type of players TCU had when we won last year is factual. I realize being a lawyer you might have trouble understanding what a fact is, but throwing out a bunch of information available to any third grader with a computer doesn't make my statement any less true. We won last year.

Psst... Does the term "blind squirrel" mean anything to you?

I think the whole statement is " even a blind squirrel will find a 50 yard line seat sometime".

by **jtstang** » Fri Apr 14, 2006 10:17 am

mrydel wrote:
jtstang wrote:
me@smu wrote:Who is claiming superiority...my statement is that those were the type of players TCU had when we won last year is factual. I realize being a lawyer you might have trouble understanding what a fact is, but throwing out a bunch of information available to any third grader with a computer doesn't make my statement any less true. We won last year.

Psst... Does the term "blind squirrel" mean anything to you?

I think the whole statement is " even a blind squirrel will find a 50 yard line seat sometime".

mrydel, you know I luv ya, but that one's a little off the mark. Finding a 50 yard line seat at an SMU game has been historically MUCH easier than finding a win has been for the ponies.

by **mrydel** » Fri Apr 14, 2006 10:40 am

You are right. I guess it is "even a blind squirrel can see a win from a 50 yard line seat sometimes".

by **jtstang** » Fri Apr 14, 2006 10:41 am

Now you're talking. And on those occasions, being a blind squirrel is actually kind of fun.

by **mrydel** » Fri Apr 14, 2006 10:46 am

jtstang wrote:Now you're talking. And on those occasions, being a blind squirrel is actually kind of fun.

As opposed to being an attorney, I would think being a blind squirrel would be very much preferred on most any occasion.

(sorry, can not resist a good attorney bashing, at least since I do not need one right this moment)

by **jtstang** » Fri Apr 14, 2006 11:26 am

mrydel wrote:
jtstang wrote:Now you're talking. And on those occasions, being a blind squirrel is actually kind of fun.

As opposed to being an attorney, I would think being a blind squirrel would be very much preferred on most any occasion.

(sorry, can not resist a good attorney bashing, at least since I do not need one right this moment)

Actually lawyering is a LOT like being a squirrel, since most clients are nuts.

by **EastStang** » Fri Apr 14, 2006 11:27 am

Hey now, don't pick on attorneys. I think over time TCU will move back in our direction. Not right away, but over time. The MWC will get stronger and they won't go 11-1 every year. We'll get better. A winning season this year, and perhaps a bowl appearance will do a lot to get us to parity with the Frogs, despite our model differences. In fact we have more supermodels than they have.

by **SoCal_Pony** » Fri Apr 14, 2006 12:41 pm

jtstang wrote:Actually lawyering is a LOT like being a squirrel, since most clients are nuts.

JT, I see it a little differently. I have a nice home with a large pecan tree.

Attorneys are vermins scurrying in my backyard, tyring to take my nuts.

by **jtstang** » Fri Apr 14, 2006 12:43 pm

SoCal_Pony wrote:
jtstang wrote:Actually lawyering is a LOT like being a squirrel, since most clients are nuts.

JT, I see it a little differently. I have a nice home with a large pecan tree.

Attorneys are vermens scurrying in my backyard, tyring to take my nuts.

Or protect your nuts. There's attorneys on both sides.

And lets all remember the one undeniable truth: Nothing EVER happens where the lawyers don't make money.

by **SoCal_Pony** » Fri Apr 14, 2006 12:50 pm

I just signed-off on an attorney bill this week.

2 months of work, $127k fee......

CHA - CHING

by **jtstang** » Fri Apr 14, 2006 12:56 pm

SoCal_Pony wrote:I just signed-off on an attorney bill this week.

2 months of work, $127k fee......

CHA - CHING

And don't forget there was a lawyer working on the other side too. Double Cha-Ching!

by **mrydel** » Fri Apr 14, 2006 1:01 pm

AH!!!!! They both deposited the money in the bank. So I get both sides also.

by **The PonyGrad** » Fri Apr 14, 2006 1:30 pm

On the other had, both parties had to withdraw money to pay them! :roll:

Lets go ahead and give the Iron Skillet back.

Who is online