SMU First To Offer Allen QB Nathan [deleted]

by **Stallion** » Wed Mar 08, 2006 7:19 pm

according to Rivals. 6-3, 194 4.8. He's getting a look from most Southwest schools though. He was at least scheduled to go to SMU's camp.

by **LA_Mustang** » Wed Mar 08, 2006 7:45 pm

Weren't we in his brother's final group of schools a couple of years ago before he signed with Arkansas?

by **Hoofprint** » Wed Mar 08, 2006 10:20 pm

I believe we were.

Hopefully the QB corral at Arkansas is crowded and he doesn't choose to follow his brother to Fayetteville.

by **White Helmet** » Thu Mar 09, 2006 7:54 am

Well its still his only offer, I mean Texas has signed what 10 kids now? So here we are chasing a kid with no offers, obviously he cant play :roll:

by **OC Mustang** » Thu Mar 09, 2006 10:03 am

He is probably ranked well with Rivals. :wink:

by **SMU Football Blog** » Thu Mar 09, 2006 10:11 am

If he comes here, I will dub him "Citizen" [deleted] and his theme song will be the song by Matt Dillon's band in the movie "Singles".

by **jtstang** » Thu Mar 09, 2006 10:11 am

Hoofprint wrote:I believe we were.

Hopefully the QB corral at Arkansas is crowded and he doesn't choose to follow his brother to Fayetteville.

Surely that town's not big enough for two Dicks.

Sorry. Couldn't help myself.

by **ClassOf81** » Thu Mar 09, 2006 10:13 am

You're really going to enjoy this kid's recruitment, aren't you?

by **Danny Noonan** » Thu Mar 09, 2006 12:17 pm

Their Allen teamates called them Big [deleted] and and Little [deleted].

Suck to be nathan.

by **Roach** » Thu Mar 09, 2006 12:42 pm

You ARE kidding, aren't you?

They answer to those names? It's hard enough to go through life with a pseudo-famous older sibling, even on a small-community basis like Allen football .... but to be saddled with a moniker like that? Ouch.

by **OC Mustang** » Thu Mar 09, 2006 1:40 pm

From now on, so that the Webmasters feel a comfort level regarding this thread, we should refer to this prospect as Nathan...um...Johnson...instead of Nathan...um...well, you know.

:mrgreen:

by **Ponymon** » Thu Mar 09, 2006 1:56 pm

I sure hope he doesn't read this thread! Bad enough we have to recruit against the Big 12, but to have to recruit against our own "boosters" (and I use that term loosely!) is pretty pathetic :oops:

by **abezontar** » Thu Mar 09, 2006 2:18 pm

by **BrianTinBigD** » Thu Mar 09, 2006 2:29 pm

Think of the bobblehead give away promotions this presents.

by **jtstang** » Thu Mar 09, 2006 2:58 pm

BrianT that was a funny visual.

SMU First To Offer Allen QB Nathan [deleted]

SMU First To Offer Allen QB Nathan [deleted]

Who is online