Page 1 of 1

OLM Andrew Blackwell Corsicana

PostPosted: Wed Jan 23, 2008 10:07 pm
by Stallion
Since Rivals claims all is lost-I had to look elsewhere. This is from a message on the Baylor website

don't know about him but Corsicana's OL Andrew Blackwell is getting more attention from SMU and Iowa State, still no word from Baylor...
oh, he's 6'5 285 has a 1450 SAT and mom is a Baylor Grad..

PostPosted: Wed Jan 23, 2008 10:09 pm
by Stallion
Rivals doesn't have a rating but says he has been offered by Northwestern State and Stephen F. Austin. Confirms 6-5, 285. No recent stories.

PostPosted: Wed Jan 23, 2008 10:12 pm
by htownponyfan
ESPN insider says :

Scouts Grade: 45
Considering: 1-Texas A&M , 2-Texas Tech , 3-TCU , 4-SMU

PostPosted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 10:09 am
by SMU_is_bowling
that is a big boy to not be rated by rivals . . . wonder why>? :?

PostPosted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 10:34 am
by SMU Kilmer
I like the height... about time!

PostPosted: Fri Jan 25, 2008 10:23 pm
by Ponymon
Pre-Season rated 3 stars by Lemming:

"He can play either LT or LG at the next level. He's very strong and technically sound with pretty good feet. A tough kid who plays hard and shows good all around athletic ability. He shows good lateral quickness, gets good positioning, and can seal off lanes. You've got to like his attitude, he'll go after defenders and pund them every chance he gets." GPA is over 2.0. Benches 335 and has a 20"VJ.

PostPosted: Sat Jan 26, 2008 4:02 am
by Stallion
What in the hell is it about these reports of a GPA over 2.0? Not impressed. Not likely to be eligible. Why even say that if you aren't in the ballpark.

PostPosted: Sat Jan 26, 2008 11:38 am
by mustangbill67
Stallion wrote:What in the hell is it about these reports of a GPA over 2.0? Not impressed. Not likely to be eligible. Why even say that if you aren't in the ballpark.


maybe the GPA is on a 3 point system :)

PostPosted: Sat Jan 26, 2008 11:41 am
by Scoops
Stallion wrote:What in the hell is it about these reports of a GPA over 2.0? Not impressed. Not likely to be eligible. Why even say that if you aren't in the ballpark.
Not likely to be eligible because he has a GPA over 2.0?
It doesn't say HOW FAR over 2.0 his GPA is, right?