Two JUCO D T's
Posted: Tue Sep 02, 2008 3:38 pmIf any more are taken for this class ( and I think there will be ) what we need is two 300# DT's.
PLEEZE
PLEEZE
Page 1 of 2
Posted: Tue Sep 02, 2008 3:38 pmPosted: Tue Sep 02, 2008 4:41 pmAgreed!
Posted: Tue Sep 02, 2008 5:25 pmWhy didnt I think of that?
Posted: Tue Sep 02, 2008 8:05 pmBecause you have not been here very long. LOL
Welcome to the board and come by the Boulevard!
Welcome to the board and come by the Boulevard!
Posted: Tue Sep 02, 2008 8:42 pmwe already have 1 tackle in Frazier. I vote linebacker, corner and tackle
Posted: Wed Sep 03, 2008 5:37 pmLet's get 10- 5 for O and 5 for D. Maybe 2 more for added measure.
GO PONIES!!!
GO PONIES!!!
Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2008 6:59 amIs the trade deadline past, we need help NOW.
Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2008 12:47 pmWe need linebackers as much as we need anything.
Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2008 3:15 pmYes, we need starters on the D-line, but we need depth at EVERY position. If I have five spots, I want 2 DT, one DE, 1 LB and 1 Safety.
Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2008 4:06 pmChickens
We need huge guys to break bones and then we are good.
Please laugh.
We have needs.
We need huge guys to break bones and then we are good.
Please laugh.
We have needs.
Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2008 6:37 pmBased on everything I have read on the various pay sites, we are going to bring in at least 5 more commitments. We have pending offers to several 3 star+ offensive players, so adding one other offensive player is entirely possible. I see the remaining ships going to the defense. How these are divided among the line, linebackers and the defensive backfield is up in the air. In addition, some of our current committments are being recruited by BCS programs so it is possible we could lose some. At least we are having this issue. Believe last year at this time we had two commitments.
Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2008 7:31 pmwe threw so many scholarships at marginal benchsitters last year we need to go for the best athletes from the largest pool including transfers and JUCOs.
Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2008 9:52 pmStallion, once more your negative comments are simply no longer welcome! ("Marginal Benchsitters"). My friend, your are not even a marginal supporter of the program.
Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2008 10:26 pmPlease enlighten us  which of our current freshmen were "marginal benchsitters" as high school seniors?Stallion wrote:we threw so many scholarships at marginal benchsitters last year we need to go for the best athletes from the largest pool including transfers and JUCOs.
Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2008 12:51 amStallion, why do you post comments that slam our new recruits? We all should support the team not run it down. What's your motive?