Page 1 of 2
OU WR Commitment Switches To Tech
Posted:
Tue Jan 13, 2009 12:39 pmby Stallion
Tech now has 4 WR commitments including 2 4 stars-I hope they are done.
Posted:
Tue Jan 13, 2009 12:56 pmby Cadillac
Damn, I misread the title. I thought you said "our WR recruit switches to Tech" I thought we'd lost Derrius Johnson.
-CoS
Posted:
Tue Jan 13, 2009 1:11 pmby SMU 86
Cadillac wrote:Damn, I misread the title. I thought you said "our WR recruit switches to Tech" I thought we'd lost Derrius Johnson.
-CoS
For a brief second I thought it said that as well. Whew. I am glad my eyes refocused. This hopefully means Tech will back off Darius.
Posted:
Tue Jan 13, 2009 1:11 pmby abezontar
ME TOO!
Posted:
Tue Jan 13, 2009 1:32 pmby Pony Up
I'm still not convinced we'll hang on to him. From everything out there, it sounds like he's getting more and more interest from other schools by the day.
Posted:
Tue Jan 13, 2009 1:32 pmby StallionsModelT
Hopefully this puts an end to their WR recruits for this year. I think Darius Johnson and Deonte McDade are going to be really special players in this offense.
Posted:
Tue Jan 13, 2009 1:39 pmby Come and Take It
StallionsModelT wrote:Hopefully this puts an end to their WR recruits for this year. I think Darius Johnson and Deonte McDade are going to be really special players in this offense.
Rumor on the Tech board is that Johnson is going to Lubbock if an offer comes his way.
Posted:
Tue Jan 13, 2009 1:44 pmby StallionsModelT
Dammit. Losing Johnson and Fontana would certainly be a blow to our class.
Posted:
Tue Jan 13, 2009 2:02 pmby White Helmet
Can we get a name or a link or something
Posted:
Tue Jan 13, 2009 2:03 pmby Stallion
Eric Ward
Posted:
Tue Jan 13, 2009 2:10 pmby White Helmet
Thanks
Posted:
Tue Jan 13, 2009 2:57 pmby George S. Patton
Pony Up wrote:I'm still not convinced we'll hang on to him. From everything out there, it sounds like he's getting more and more interest from other schools by the day.
Oh, for God's sake. Knock it off.
Posted:
Tue Jan 13, 2009 3:11 pmby White Helmet
Why cant he post his opinion? It is a message board
Posted:
Tue Jan 13, 2009 3:16 pmby MustangIcon
George S. Patton wrote:Pony Up wrote:I'm still not convinced we'll hang on to him. From everything out there, it sounds like he's getting more and more interest from other schools by the day.
Oh, for God's sake. Knock it off.
Go proclaim another season over or [deleted] about how much the Big 10 s*cks. Apparently you are the only person on this board allowed to make asinine statements every second post...
Posted:
Tue Jan 13, 2009 3:30 pmby George S. Patton
MustangIcon wrote:George S. Patton wrote:Pony Up wrote:I'm still not convinced we'll hang on to him. From everything out there, it sounds like he's getting more and more interest from other schools by the day.
Oh, for God's sake. Knock it off.
Go proclaim another season over or [deleted] about how much the Big 10 s*cks. Apparently you are the only person on this board allowed to make asinine statements every second post...
OK, so you agree that his comment was asinine. Thanks.
And where did I say he couldn't post an opinion? He posted one. And then I posted one. It is a message board.