Aggies Surrendering?

by **Stallion** » Wed Mar 04, 2009 3:28 pm

the A&M Rivals site Aggie Yell has come out with its Top 125. Funny as hell because all 19 UT commitments are ranked in Top 59 in the State. I guess Aggies have given up on their annual nauseating bitchin' about how the recruiting services overrate UT recruits and downgrade A&M recruits. Everybody now seems to be in agreement that the Aggies are getting routed. The White Flag of Surrender is being waived. Maybe the moderater isn't a big fan of the Aggie Coaching Staff and their recruiting performance. Funny as Hell.

BTW this new list can now be accessed on the Composite Texas Top 100 thread. Plus now all of the various lists have direct links at the top.

by **George S. Patton** » Wed Mar 04, 2009 3:36 pm

It's just ridiculous that Texas is already at 19 commitment. Man, they have a proven system that works.

by **expony18** » Wed Mar 04, 2009 4:04 pm

yah its called winning...

by **abezontar** » Wed Mar 04, 2009 4:21 pm

expony18 wrote:yah its called winning...

what's that now?

by **PonyLaw_aTm** » Wed Mar 04, 2009 5:27 pm

Texas outrecruits A&M?

stop the presses!

by **SoCal_Pony** » Wed Mar 04, 2009 6:28 pm

If SMU was in the Big XII I think they could consistently out-recruit A&M as well.

Top notch academic reputation in a superior city.

by **SMU21TCU10** » Wed Mar 04, 2009 7:54 pm

SoCal_Pony wrote:If SMU was in the Big XII I think they could consistently out-recruit A&M as well.

Top notch academic reputation in a superior city.

We would be like Iowa State in the big 12. But worse...

by **SoCal_Pony** » Wed Mar 04, 2009 10:13 pm

Dallas is a far more desirable city to Stillwater, Ames, Manhattan, Waco, College Station, Columbia, Lubbock, Lincoln, Lawrence or Norman...(I am talking FB)

OU and Texas have traditionÃ¢â‚¬Â¦understood.

Below those 2 schools SMU could compete against anybody in the Big 12.

Think Miami.

by **huskerpony** » Thu Mar 05, 2009 12:23 am

I think you are forgetting about 5 National Championships and an 80,000 seat stadium in Lincoln as well......

Dallas is, of course, a more desirable location, but Boulder beats Dallas on location by a long shot too. And Dallas isn't Miami either. (Granted, I would rather live in Dallas than Miami, but to a high school kid......no contest.)

But I agree with your overall point. You would think we ought to have an advantage over Stillwater, Lubbock, etc.

by **NickSMU17** » Thu Mar 05, 2009 7:42 am

Boulder sucks.....

by **ponyboy** » Thu Mar 05, 2009 8:49 am

True. Who likes natural beauty, a laidback lifestyle, a beautiful campus, a very cool stadium.

by **SMU21TCU10** » Thu Mar 05, 2009 11:23 am

This is what i think of when I think of boulder

by **Buckethead** » Thu Mar 05, 2009 11:47 am

Are you sure that isn't Austin?

by **EastStang** » Thu Mar 05, 2009 2:38 pm

I think of the Kitty Bong when I think of Boulder.

by **huskerpony** » Thu Mar 05, 2009 2:41 pm

EastStang wrote:I think of the Kitty Bong when I think of Boulder.

That, unfortunately, was in Lincoln.

Aggies Surrendering?

Aggies Surrendering?

Who is online