Page 1 of 3
Aggies Surrendering?
Posted:
Wed Mar 04, 2009 3:28 pmby Stallion
the A&M Rivals site Aggie Yell has come out with its Top 125. Funny as hell because all 19 UT commitments are ranked in Top 59 in the State. I guess Aggies have given up on their annual nauseating bitchin' about how the recruiting services overrate UT recruits and downgrade A&M recruits. Everybody now seems to be in agreement that the Aggies are getting routed. The White Flag of Surrender is being waived. Maybe the moderater isn't a big fan of the Aggie Coaching Staff and their recruiting performance. Funny as Hell.
BTW this new list can now be accessed on the Composite Texas Top 100 thread. Plus now all of the various lists have direct links at the top.
Posted:
Wed Mar 04, 2009 3:36 pmby George S. Patton
It's just ridiculous that Texas is already at 19 commitment. Man, they have a proven system that works.
Posted:
Wed Mar 04, 2009 4:04 pmby expony18
yah its called winning...
Posted:
Wed Mar 04, 2009 4:21 pmby abezontar
expony18 wrote:yah its called winning...
what's that now?
Posted:
Wed Mar 04, 2009 5:27 pmby PonyLaw_aTm
Texas outrecruits A&M?
stop the presses!
Posted:
Wed Mar 04, 2009 6:28 pmby SoCal_Pony
If SMU was in the Big XII I think they could consistently out-recruit A&M as well.
Top notch academic reputation in a superior city.
Posted:
Wed Mar 04, 2009 7:54 pmby SMU21TCU10
SoCal_Pony wrote:If SMU was in the Big XII I think they could consistently out-recruit A&M as well.
Top notch academic reputation in a superior city.
We would be like Iowa State in the big 12. But worse...
Posted:
Wed Mar 04, 2009 10:13 pmby SoCal_Pony
Dallas is a far more desirable city to Stillwater, Ames, Manhattan, Waco, College Station, Columbia, Lubbock, Lincoln, Lawrence or Norman...(I am talking FB)
OU and Texas have tradition…understood.
Below those 2 schools SMU could compete against anybody in the Big 12.
Think Miami.
Posted:
Thu Mar 05, 2009 12:23 amby huskerpony
I think you are forgetting about 5 National Championships and an 80,000 seat stadium in Lincoln as well......
Dallas is, of course, a more desirable location, but Boulder beats Dallas on location by a long shot too. And Dallas isn't Miami either. (Granted, I would rather live in Dallas than Miami, but to a high school kid......no contest.)
But I agree with your overall point. You would think we ought to have an advantage over Stillwater, Lubbock, etc.
Posted:
Thu Mar 05, 2009 7:42 amby NickSMU17
Boulder sucks.....
Posted:
Thu Mar 05, 2009 8:49 amby ponyboy
True. Who likes natural beauty, a laidback lifestyle, a beautiful campus, a very cool stadium.
Posted:
Thu Mar 05, 2009 11:23 amby SMU21TCU10
This is what i think of when I think of boulder
Posted:
Thu Mar 05, 2009 11:47 amby Buckethead
Are you sure that isn't Austin?
Posted:
Thu Mar 05, 2009 2:38 pmby EastStang
I think of the Kitty Bong when I think of Boulder.
Posted:
Thu Mar 05, 2009 2:41 pmby huskerpony
EastStang wrote:I think of the Kitty Bong when I think of Boulder.
That, unfortunately, was in Lincoln.
