Tulsa v. SMU
Posted: Thu Jul 23, 2009 10:42 pmwhile everyone wants to compare smu to TT, UT, A&M, TCU, etc. I am more interested in how we compare to Tulsa, who has been a domiinate force in CUSA.... Right now we have 3*** and 2**, while tulsa has 5*** and 3**. looking at their commitment list, they only have one from texas (way to go JJ!! keeping coach graham out of tulsa, yahhhhhhh!!!) sorry i got side tracked...
Tulsa
3 commits from Union (essentially the HP or Southlake of white boy football, without the money), 2 of the three are 2 stars
1 three star from arkansas, thats myrdels territory, so we can blame him
1 three star from bixby oklahoma... only offers: TU, Air Force... 5'11, 191, 4.5 (starting to question rivals)
..... since the general won't pony up for a rivals subscription i won't go into further detail... but I honestly, feel like our class is as good as tulsa's. they have ONE commitment that is legit, but a little small based on the Stallion Rating System
Tulsa
3 commits from Union (essentially the HP or Southlake of white boy football, without the money), 2 of the three are 2 stars
1 three star from arkansas, thats myrdels territory, so we can blame him
1 three star from bixby oklahoma... only offers: TU, Air Force... 5'11, 191, 4.5 (starting to question rivals)
..... since the general won't pony up for a rivals subscription i won't go into further detail... but I honestly, feel like our class is as good as tulsa's. they have ONE commitment that is legit, but a little small based on the Stallion Rating System
