PonyFans.comBoard IndexAround the HilltopFootballRecruitingBasketballOther Sports

We are better than Memphis... in BBall?

Discuss SMU recruiting in this forum.

Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower

We are better than Memphis... in BBall?

Postby davidpaul123 » Wed Aug 19, 2009 7:18 am

Recruit DJ Stephens chose Memphis and had this to say...

"I went down to their camp and they saw me play, and after that, they pretty much said that I wasn't good enough to get into SMU and they needed a player of a better caliber than me :roll:

"But Memphis and SMU are in the same conference (Conference USA) and I'm going to Memphis, who won their conference last year." :shock:

http://www.kdhnews.com/news/story.aspx?s=35250
Image
User avatar
davidpaul123
Heisman
 
Posts: 1476
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 9:47 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re: We are better than Memphis... in BBall?

Postby MidlandMustang » Wed Aug 19, 2009 9:22 am

Wow, I guess all of a sudden we're just loaded with talent.
MidlandMustang
Varsity
 
Posts: 284
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 4:18 pm
Location: Midland, TX

Re: We are better than Memphis... in BBall?

Postby MrMustang1965 » Wed Aug 19, 2009 10:27 am

WTF?
User avatar
MrMustang1965
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 11161
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2001 3:01 am
Location: Dallas,TX,USA

Re: We are better than Memphis... in BBall?

Postby White Helmet » Wed Aug 19, 2009 12:20 pm

maybe he meant academically?
User avatar
White Helmet
Hall of Famer
 
Posts: 2411
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2004 2:39 pm
Location: Oro Valley, AZ

Re: We are better than Memphis... in BBall?

Postby davidpaul123 » Wed Aug 19, 2009 1:31 pm

White Helmet wrote:maybe he meant academically?


that was the only thing i could think of as well. :shock:
Image
User avatar
davidpaul123
Heisman
 
Posts: 1476
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 9:47 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re: We are better than Memphis... in BBall?

Postby 03Mustang » Wed Aug 19, 2009 2:21 pm

We do need some top-flight talent to make up for the mediocre coaching - that much is true
03Mustang
PonyFans.com Legend
 
Posts: 4238
Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2006 12:47 am
Location: Allen, TX

Re: We are better than Memphis... in BBall?

Postby MidlandMustang » Wed Aug 19, 2009 2:35 pm

I was thinking he was talking about academics as well. However, he ended it by saying that he was told we needed "a player of better caliber than him." That's what got me.
MidlandMustang
Varsity
 
Posts: 284
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 4:18 pm
Location: Midland, TX

Re: We are better than Memphis... in BBall?

Postby Stallion » Wed Aug 19, 2009 4:17 pm

This is a 2009 Recruit right? Memphis got left shorthanded because of the Coaching change and defections of its prior commitments to Kentucky and elsewhere. Another guy went Pro right. Almost their entire roster has turned over in a year. They are probably looking for a body to fill out their Roster. Doesn't really look like your typical Memphis recruit. And is SMU really looking for a tweener. Although reportedly SMU could give one more scholarship this year I encourage Doherty to pocket it or save it for a D1A transfer rather than gambling on a project. I could be wrong but I think this is more a case of Memphis scrambling than SMU overlooking a guy
"With a quarter of a tank of gas, we can get everything we need right here in DFW." -SMU Head Coach Chad Morris

When momentum starts rolling downhill in recruiting-WATCH OUT.
Stallion
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 44302
Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2000 4:01 am
Location: Dallas,Texas,USA

Re: We are better than Memphis... in BBall?

Postby davidpaul123 » Wed Aug 19, 2009 4:45 pm

Stallion wrote:This is a 2009 Recruit right? Memphis got left shorthanded because of the Coaching change and defections of its prior commitments to Kentucky and elsewhere. Another guy went Pro right. Almost their entire roster has turned over in a year. They are probably looking for a body to fill out their Roster. Doesn't really look like your typical Memphis recruit. And is SMU really looking for a tweener. Although reportedly SMU could give one more scholarship this year I encourage Doherty to pocket it or save it for a D1A transfer rather than gambling on a project. I could be wrong but I think this is more a case of Memphis scrambling than SMU overlooking a guy


yeah, this is a 09 recruit. If this is a stretch for memphis, then it is DEFINATELY a stretch since even we didnt sound interested.
Image
User avatar
davidpaul123
Heisman
 
Posts: 1476
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 9:47 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re: We are better than Memphis... in BBall?

Postby PonyDoh » Wed Aug 19, 2009 7:22 pm

Stallion nailed it. They were down to 7 scholarship players ever since Martin Ngalaro got hurt. They'll jump to 8 when/if Elliot Williams is cleared. This kid allows them to scrimmage. Pastner wouldn't sniff him otherwise. Our staff could use some tact, though. This isn't the first time we've heard these types of stories.
“When I first committed to SMU, I thought it would take a couple of years of building. But with these players coming in, we should make a run. We have a lot of heavy hitters. It could get real ugly for a lot of teams we play.”- Jalen Jones
PonyDoh
PonyFans.com Legend
 
Posts: 3066
Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2007 2:58 pm

Re: We are better than Memphis... in BBall?

Postby FriscoPMG » Fri Aug 21, 2009 11:32 am

Surely there is more to this kid's story since he had some pretty decent offers from C-USA schools(Tulsa, Southern Miss) before either he waited too long or they withdrew them. But without knowing the full story or knowing whether we're looking to use that extra scholarship in a different way, seems odd that we would flat out tell a kid he's not good enough to play here when better schools in our conference were all interested in him.
I don't know anything about the kid other than what this story says, but I'd think any athletic "big man" would fit into this rotation if he has any skills at all. I guess we already kind of have that in Mook, but if Papa has another year like he did last season, then we'll need any help we can get with physical play down low...even if it is from a 6'5 guy. And if he can get out and run with the guards, then that's an added bonus.
Regardless, the kid's quote certainly makes the SMU coaches sound a bit foolish and arrogant even if they weren't meant to come off that way.
User avatar
FriscoPMG
All-American
 
Posts: 769
Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2005 4:59 am

Re: We are better than Memphis... in BBall?

Postby PonyDoh » Fri Aug 21, 2009 3:41 pm

FriscoPMG wrote:Surely there is more to this kid's story since he had some pretty decent offers from C-USA schools(Tulsa, Southern Miss) before either he waited too long or they withdrew them. But without knowing the full story or knowing whether we're looking to use that extra scholarship in a different way, seems odd that we would flat out tell a kid he's not good enough to play here when better schools in our conference were all interested in him.
I don't know anything about the kid other than what this story says, but I'd think any athletic "big man" would fit into this rotation if he has any skills at all. I guess we already kind of have that in Mook, but if Papa has another year like he did last season, then we'll need any help we can get with physical play down low...even if it is from a 6'5 guy. And if he can get out and run with the guards, then that's an added bonus.
Regardless, the kid's quote certainly makes the SMU coaches sound a bit foolish and arrogant even if they weren't meant to come off that way.


our staff does tell kids they aren't good enough. I know of one local w/a Tulsa offer that was told he couldn't play at SMU, wasn't good enough. That said, if that same kid gave a verbal to SMU tomorrow, you'd all be pissed that we offered the kid.
“When I first committed to SMU, I thought it would take a couple of years of building. But with these players coming in, we should make a run. We have a lot of heavy hitters. It could get real ugly for a lot of teams we play.”- Jalen Jones
PonyDoh
PonyFans.com Legend
 
Posts: 3066
Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2007 2:58 pm

Re: We are better than Memphis... in BBall?

Postby FriscoPMG » Fri Aug 21, 2009 6:11 pm

PonyDoh wrote:our staff does tell kids they aren't good enough. I know of one local w/a Tulsa offer that was told he couldn't play at SMU, wasn't good enough. That said, if that same kid gave a verbal to SMU tomorrow, you'd all be pissed that we offered the kid.


Why would we (assume I'm included in the "you'd all") be pissed if we got a verbal from a kid who was offered by Tulsa or other similar schools? I would much rather be beating out the likes of a Tulsa (or other schools above us in C-USA) for a kid instead of regularly flirting with higher touted recruits only to eventually lose out to a major program. Until we start winning, we have to build a foundation on solid players instead of putting our hopes on landing studs like McCoy. Yes, I know you have to try for those higher ranked kids and you never know, but obviously you can't rely on hitting the home run every time when you're not a big hitter.
User avatar
FriscoPMG
All-American
 
Posts: 769
Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2005 4:59 am

Re: We are better than Memphis... in BBall?

Postby PonyDoh » Sat Aug 22, 2009 7:58 am

FriscoPMG wrote:
PonyDoh wrote:our staff does tell kids they aren't good enough. I know of one local w/a Tulsa offer that was told he couldn't play at SMU, wasn't good enough. That said, if that same kid gave a verbal to SMU tomorrow, you'd all be pissed that we offered the kid.


Why would we (assume I'm included in the "you'd all") be pissed if we got a verbal from a kid who was offered by Tulsa or other similar schools? I would much rather be beating out the likes of a Tulsa (or other schools above us in C-USA) for a kid instead of regularly flirting with higher touted recruits only to eventually lose out to a major program. Until we start winning, we have to build a foundation on solid players instead of putting our hopes on landing studs like McCoy. Yes, I know you have to try for those higher ranked kids and you never know, but obviously you can't rely on hitting the home run every time when you're not a big hitter.


I don't disagree. I see people getting excited by Keaton Miles, Michael Cobbins and laugh. All you can do is make a pitch and go hard after those kids, but don't have actual expectations of landing them. Obviously, we want to beat out Tulsa for players as well, but the aforementioned kid was offered to fill a role. His other offers are Northern Arizona, San Diego etc. Basically, he's not a need for us, and if we're to be good in the near future, you have to do better then the kid. I wouldn't have offered the kid who just went to Memphis either. We aren't short on role players, we need a few difference-makers.
“When I first committed to SMU, I thought it would take a couple of years of building. But with these players coming in, we should make a run. We have a lot of heavy hitters. It could get real ugly for a lot of teams we play.”- Jalen Jones
PonyDoh
PonyFans.com Legend
 
Posts: 3066
Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2007 2:58 pm

Re: We are better than Memphis... in BBall?

Postby MustangLaxer » Sun Aug 23, 2009 2:08 am

my guess is that he is a ruh-tard...like rainman
User avatar
MustangLaxer
Heisman
 
Posts: 1175
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2006 8:14 pm
Location: The Hilltop


Return to Recruiting

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests