Page 1 of 2
COMMITMENT #18
Posted:
Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:28 pmby SMU 86
I guess Coach Reinebold was right today when he said that recruiting is full swing. (sub)
http://smu.rivals.com/showmsg.asp?fid=2 ... 74&style=2
Re: COMMITMENT #18
Posted:
Thu Sep 03, 2009 5:10 pmby SMU2007
YES! I was starting to get afraid that we wouldn't have enough WRs in this draft class. What a relief!
Re: COMMITMENT #18
Posted:
Thu Sep 03, 2009 5:11 pmby SMU 86
SMU2007 wrote:YES! I was starting to get afraid that we wouldn't have enough WRs in this draft class. What a relief!
Re: COMMITMENT #18
Posted:
Thu Sep 03, 2009 5:16 pmby StallionsModelT
Wonder how this affects our recruitment of Pat Faulk, the kid from Kerens with an offer from Nebraska. I think he has us listed as his favorite but we are getting loaded down with skill guys right now.
Re: COMMITMENT #18
Posted:
Thu Sep 03, 2009 5:27 pmby SMU 86
Good question, it doesn't. Faulk is still being recruited as a RB and yes we would still take him.
Re: COMMITMENT #18
Posted:
Fri Sep 04, 2009 12:16 pmby HFvictory
From DeBartolo Sports:
Keenan Holman (Beaumont, TX – Central HS) – Holman is a rising senior who has the whole package as a wide receiver – good size, good speed, good hands. He won’t blow you away, but he’s the type of guy who just makes plays.
Re: COMMITMENT #18
Posted:
Fri Sep 04, 2009 3:21 pmby SMUfiji43
Signing another recruit is always good news, but is anyone else worried about the lack of big men? I know we picked up a lot of good offensive linemen last year, but we don't have much defensive line depth. Where are all of these receiver commits going to play? Our system is isn't a revolving door with new WRs on the field every play. We have 4 guys with situational subs(ex Haynes) and thats about it from what I've seen. Having great depth at any position is never a bad thing, but I feel bad for some of these receivers coming in who may never get their shot.
Re: COMMITMENT #18
Posted:
Sat Sep 05, 2009 8:08 amby indianmustang
welcome to smu
Re: COMMITMENT #18
Posted:
Sun Sep 06, 2009 11:08 pmby ponyscott
Some of those WR's will fall off..they will committ and when they see all the competition they will look elsewhere..
Re: COMMITMENT #18
Posted:
Mon Sep 07, 2009 10:25 amby SMU 86
Considering how our WR's looked against SFA we need every one of them with ES graduating.
Re: COMMITMENT #18
Posted:
Tue Sep 08, 2009 5:00 pmby Lotus
Seems he's also a basketball player. Listed at 6-1, 170. Neither service reports a 40 time or any other offers.
Re: COMMITMENT #18
Posted:
Tue Sep 08, 2009 6:03 pmby SMU 86
Lotus wrote:Seems he's also a basketball player. Listed at 6-1, 170. Neither service reports a 40 time.
He's fast.
Re: COMMITMENT #18
Posted:
Tue Sep 08, 2009 10:19 pmby squire
D Linemen only from here on out. Don't be afraid of the JC's!
Re: COMMITMENT #18
Posted:
Wed Sep 09, 2009 1:35 pmby SMU21TCU10
squire wrote:D Linemen only from here on out. Don't be afraid of the JC's!
We better take 2 JUCO DL. Although I have a bad feeling we dont...
Re: COMMITMENT #18
Posted:
Thu Sep 10, 2009 3:25 pmby Lefty
SMU 86 wrote:Lotus wrote:Seems he's also a basketball player. Listed at 6-1, 170. Neither service reports a 40 time.
He's fast.
OK, but HOW fast? I assume if we were talking Aldrick Robinson-fast, this board would have exploded, so that's not what I expect. But does anyone think he's a legit 4.5? At 6-1, that's pretty solid.