Page 1 of 2
New Rivals Rating

Posted:
Mon Dec 07, 2009 11:59 pm
by Ponymon
Just noticed that Ashton Duhe was rated 3 Stars 5.5 by Rivals. We are now up to 12 3-Star recruits.

Re: New Rivals Rating

Posted:
Tue Dec 08, 2009 1:37 am
by Eye In the Sky
Very nice. I don't claim to know how the rating system works, but based on the number of offers he has, I think he should be a 3 star. I still find it odd that some of our 3 star commits don't have any other offers, while guys like Fields, Beard and Guinyard have multiple BCS offers and are only rated slightly higher...not that I'm complaining. I'll definitely take it! If Duhe is a 3 star, shouldn't Parker Mack be a 4 star, based on the quality of offers? Would be huge if we could land him!
Re: New Rivals Rating

Posted:
Tue Dec 08, 2009 11:11 am
by NickSMU17
pope came in as a 2*....
Re: New Rivals Rating

Posted:
Tue Dec 08, 2009 12:11 pm
by jkflamebo
What's Jeremy Johnson predicted to be?
Re: New Rivals Rating

Posted:
Tue Dec 08, 2009 12:12 pm
by SMU 86
jkflamebo wrote:What's Jeremy Johnson predicted to be?
3
Re: New Rivals Rating

Posted:
Tue Dec 08, 2009 12:16 pm
by SMU 86
Eye In the Sky wrote:Very nice. I don't claim to know how the rating system works, but based on the number of offers he has, I think he should be a 3 star. I still find it odd that some of our 3 star commits don't have any other offers, while guys like Fields, Beard and Guinyard have multiple BCS offers and are only rated slightly higher...not that I'm complaining. I'll definitely take it! If Duhe is a 3 star, shouldn't Parker Mack be a 4 star, based on the quality of offers? Would be huge if we could land him!
Duhe is a guard and a strong one at that. Mack is a tackle and what may be holding him back is foot speed. He is about where he should be.
Re: New Rivals Rating

Posted:
Tue Dec 08, 2009 1:33 pm
by RednBlue11
is he tall? that's what counts right now...
Re: New Rivals Rating

Posted:
Tue Dec 08, 2009 1:37 pm
by Junior
Is this Duhe's first rating? Or was he bumped from 2 to 3?
Re: New Rivals Rating

Posted:
Tue Dec 08, 2009 2:36 pm
by SMU 86
Junior wrote:Is this Duhe's first rating? Or was he bumped from 2 to 3?
1st rating.
Re: New Rivals Rating

Posted:
Tue Dec 08, 2009 3:16 pm
by Junior
SMU 86 wrote:Junior wrote:Is this Duhe's first rating? Or was he bumped from 2 to 3?
1st rating.
thanks
Re: New Rivals Rating

Posted:
Tue Dec 08, 2009 6:38 pm
by Cadillac
for what it's worth this last batch of ratings has pushed us to 2nd in C-USA West recruiting behind only Houston.
-CoS
Re: New Rivals Rating

Posted:
Tue Dec 08, 2009 6:59 pm
by SMU 86
Cadillac wrote:for what it's worth this last batch of ratings has pushed us to 2nd in C-USA West recruiting behind only Houston.
-CoS
I believe it is third behind Houston and Southern Miss.
Re: New Rivals Rating

Posted:
Tue Dec 08, 2009 7:07 pm
by ponyscott
SMU 86 wrote:Cadillac wrote:for what it's worth this last batch of ratings has pushed us to 2nd in C-USA West recruiting behind only Houston.
-CoS
I believe it is third behind Houston and Southern Miss.
You really have to believe when the signing class is announced and we get some recruits that aren't even on the lists ( from Lousville and maybe Kansas castoffs) that we will be at #2 or even #1 with some luck.
Re: New Rivals Rating

Posted:
Tue Dec 08, 2009 7:16 pm
by Junior
SMU 86 wrote:Cadillac wrote:for what it's worth this last batch of ratings has pushed us to 2nd in C-USA West recruiting behind only Houston.
-CoS
I believe it is third behind Houston and Southern Miss.
USM is in the East. So he's correct, 2nd in the West.
Re: New Rivals Rating

Posted:
Tue Dec 08, 2009 8:33 pm
by SMU 86
That's right, I misread the west part and thought he was talking about CUSA as a whole. Either way we are doing pretty good.