Page 1 of 2
Re-Commit instead of 24# really
Posted:
Sun Jan 24, 2010 12:30 pmby ponyscott
Whew, that one had me worried...great re-commit for us. Slot position is ok for him and maybe they do a 'Wildcat' or call it a 'Stallion' QB spot situation
(Edited...sorry my bad as it is almost like a commit, just a re---)
Re: Re-Commit instead of 24# really
Posted:
Sun Jan 24, 2010 1:10 pmby StallionsModelT
This is huge. The thought of getting him on the field in a variety of ways is very exciting.
Re: Re-Commit instead of 24# really
Posted:
Sun Jan 24, 2010 1:14 pmby SMU2007
would have been really bad to lose the kid to rice after he had been committed for so long. very glad june nailed this one down
Re: Re-Commit instead of 24# really
Posted:
Sun Jan 24, 2010 1:20 pmby Stallion
he's so accurate as a passer-close to 70% he could kinda of transform the Wild Mustang scheme in ways other schools haven't. Can you see a Read Option Fade Back and hit a wide open receiver. It could put a lot of pressure on the CBs-although he looks nothing like Vince Young his Read Option play has been compared to Vince Young many times in East Texas. Of course for that play to really work we might need a TE/HB
Re: Re-Commit instead of 24# really
Posted:
Sun Jan 24, 2010 1:32 pmby RGV Pony
And not to belabor a point, but so much for the tisd curse. Funny, we actually had a coach there say wed be blackballed, and we went and got arguably the two best players in the sistrict. Yet years later we can't overcome the same thing in bball w/ disd
Re: Re-Commit instead of 24# really
Posted:
Sun Jan 24, 2010 1:53 pmby Stallion
that was Tyler Lee-Johnson is from Tyler John Tyler
Re: Re-Commit instead of 24# really
Posted:
Sun Jan 24, 2010 2:09 pmby RGV Pony
Hence my reference to the district not the school. I'm well aware of what's what in tyler. I have a business maybe two blocks from rel.
Re: Re-Commit instead of 24# really
Posted:
Sun Jan 24, 2010 2:18 pmby Stallion
well we have struck out on about 3 kids we wanted from Tyler Lee-but we are still offering Tyler Lee kids for what it is worth
Re: Re-Commit instead of 24# really
Posted:
Sun Jan 24, 2010 2:22 pmby BRStang
Wait, am I missing something? I see Gottschalk and Johnson. Who is #23?
Re: Re-Commit instead of 24# really
Posted:
Sun Jan 24, 2010 2:43 pmby BRStang
Don't all post at once. Geez. I suppose Sorrell is #23, although he is not listed on either service. Go Mustangs!
Re: Re-Commit instead of 24# really
Posted:
Sun Jan 24, 2010 2:53 pmby ponyscott
BRStang wrote:Wait, am I missing something? I see Gottschalk and Johnson. Who is #23?
Johnson was already committed so Sorrell is the 23 actually.
Re: Re-Commit instead of 24# really
Posted:
Sun Jan 24, 2010 2:56 pmby Casey
According to a relative of Johnson's, he never really wanted to go elsewhere — just flattered by attention form other schools, wanted to take visits, etc.
Re: Re-Commit instead of 24# really
Posted:
Sun Jan 24, 2010 2:58 pmby az1
Casey wrote:According to a relative of Johnson's, he never really wanted to go elsewhere — just flattered by attention form other schools, wanted to take visits, etc.
Do you have a source for that statement?
Re: Re-Commit instead of 24# really
Posted:
Sun Jan 24, 2010 3:10 pmby SMU 86
Casey wrote:According to a relative of Johnson's, he never really wanted to go elsewhere — just flattered by attention form other schools, wanted to take visits, etc.
That is not even close to the truth. I am like az1, do you have a source or link?.
Re: Re-Commit instead of 24# really
Posted:
Sun Jan 24, 2010 3:18 pmby PK
SMU 86 wrote:Casey wrote:According to a relative of Johnson's, he never really wanted to go elsewhere — just flattered by attention form other schools, wanted to take visits, etc.
That is not even close to the truth. I am like az1, do you have a source or link?.
Let's see...Johnson is from Tyler...Casey is from Tyler. Casey says that "According to a relative of Johnson's...." My guess would be that Casey's source is the Johnson relative.
