Page 1 of 1

New JUCO?

PostPosted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 9:38 am
by GoRedGoBlue
See School JUCO sites

Re: New JUCO?

PostPosted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 9:49 am
by BUS
Still smiling and laughing about that blast of posts.

Perfect for this board that is becoming a labor to wade threw the advertising. And not even the paid advertising that pays for this site.

Re: New JUCO?

PostPosted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 11:25 am
by SMU_is_bowling
BUS wrote:Still smiling and laughing about that blast of posts.

Perfect for this board that is becoming a labor to wade threw the advertising. And not even the paid advertising that pays for this site.


Seriously!

Re: New JUCO?

PostPosted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 12:19 pm
by couch 'em
If paysite based recruiting talk is run off of this board, then everyone will discuss paysite info on the pay sites.

Only a couple people will be left to discuss recruiting on ponyfans at all.

More time spent away from ponyfans is less page loads, thus less advertising revenue.

it is also more non-recruiting posts made on paysites, further hurting ponyfans in quality and income.

Re: New JUCO?

PostPosted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 12:28 pm
by smupony94
time to turn PF into a pay site

Re: New JUCO?

PostPosted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 12:34 pm
by jtstang
couch 'em wrote:If paysite based recruiting talk is run off of this board, then everyone will discuss paysite info on the pay sites.

Only a couple people will be left to discuss recruiting on ponyfans at all.

There are only a couple of people actually discussing recruiting as it is...everybody else is code talking.

If you code talk without saying anything, then you are really only talking to the subscribers anyway...why not do it on the pays sites?

Re: New JUCO?

PostPosted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 12:58 pm
by smupony94
jtstang wrote:
couch 'em wrote:If paysite based recruiting talk is run off of this board, then everyone will discuss paysite info on the pay sites.

Only a couple people will be left to discuss recruiting on ponyfans at all.

There are only a couple of people actually discussing recruiting as it is...everybody else is code talking.

If you code talk without saying anything, then you are really only talking to the subscribers anyway...why not do it on the pays sites?

Thank you Xenu

Re: New JUCO?

PostPosted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 4:30 pm
by jtstang
Only subscribers can call me Xenu. Since you paid for the lifetime membership with the general's credit card, you qualify. Just remember to keep up with the monthly beating payments if you eventually want to be clear.

Re: New JUCO?

PostPosted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 4:39 pm
by smupony94
My inner Thetan has been acting up

Re: New JUCO?

PostPosted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 6:37 pm
by SMU2007
jtstang wrote:
couch 'em wrote:If paysite based recruiting talk is run off of this board, then everyone will discuss paysite info on the pay sites.

Only a couple people will be left to discuss recruiting on ponyfans at all.

There are only a couple of people actually discussing recruiting as it is...everybody else is code talking.

If you code talk without saying anything, then you are really only talking to the subscribers anyway...why not do it on the pays sites?



No code talking dumba.ss. Just discussing the recruits without mentioning their actual name. How many posts a day can you make whining about your choice not to subscribe?

Re: New JUCO?

PostPosted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 6:47 pm
by PK
SMU2007 wrote:No code talking dumba.ss. Just discussing the recruits without mentioning their actual name. How many posts a day can you make whining about your choice not to subscribe?
Not only do you not mention their names, but also very little else about them. Just enough info to let your fellow subscribers know who you are talking about (code). So again since you subsribers are the only ones who know who you are talking about, why not do your talking on the pay sites?...not as much fun for you????

Re: New JUCO?

PostPosted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 7:02 pm
by jtstang
He's pretty defensive for a subscriber, huh PK?

Re: New JUCO?

PostPosted: Wed Feb 03, 2010 12:12 am
by PK
jtstang wrote:He's pretty defensive for a subscriber, huh PK?

I was thinking offensive...but then what do I know...I don't subscribe. :roll: