In reviewing some of the recruiting services rankings of our recruits, I am amazed at the diversity of opinion. I personally prefer services that rank by position. It seems to me it is the only ranking that has some objectivity to it. How do you compare a QB to a DE or WR anyway?
Having said that, in looking at Rivals versus Insiders, Rivals has Ricky Joe Meeks for instance as the #27 Pro style QB and Chris Phillips as the #28 Dual threat QB. Insiders combines the categories and neither make it into their top 104 QBs - where the ranking stops. Are these services using different criteria or are they catering to particular schools?
It is not just with SMUs recruits. James Battle received a #8 Dual threat ranking and falls to #40 in Insiders. What gives? That seems like a huge evaluation swing even if you combine the QB rankings.
I actually prefer that Rivals differentiates QB types and linebackers (ILB & OLB).
To me, the star rankings and any average star rankings are basically worthless. But I understand why they use them.
What is more impressive to me is that we have 9 players who rank in the top 70 nationally for their position, with 7 falling in the top 50. That's something to get excited about IMHO.
Any thoughts?