Question on recruiting rankings

In reviewing some of the recruiting services rankings of our recruits, I am amazed at the diversity of opinion. I personally prefer services that rank by position. It seems to me it is the only ranking that has some objectivity to it. How do you compare a QB to a DE or WR anyway?
Having said that, in looking at Rivals versus Insiders, Rivals has Ricky Joe Meeks for instance as the #27 Pro style QB and Chris Phillips as the #28 Dual threat QB. Insiders combines the categories and neither make it into their top 104 QBs - where the ranking stops. Are these services using different criteria or are they catering to particular schools?
It is not just with SMUs recruits. James Battle received a #8 Dual threat ranking and falls to #40 in Insiders. What gives? That seems like a huge evaluation swing even if you combine the QB rankings.
I actually prefer that Rivals differentiates QB types and linebackers (ILB & OLB).
To me, the star rankings and any average star rankings are basically worthless. But I understand why they use them.
What is more impressive to me is that we have 9 players who rank in the top 70 nationally for their position, with 7 falling in the top 50. That's something to get excited about IMHO.
Any thoughts?
Having said that, in looking at Rivals versus Insiders, Rivals has Ricky Joe Meeks for instance as the #27 Pro style QB and Chris Phillips as the #28 Dual threat QB. Insiders combines the categories and neither make it into their top 104 QBs - where the ranking stops. Are these services using different criteria or are they catering to particular schools?
It is not just with SMUs recruits. James Battle received a #8 Dual threat ranking and falls to #40 in Insiders. What gives? That seems like a huge evaluation swing even if you combine the QB rankings.
I actually prefer that Rivals differentiates QB types and linebackers (ILB & OLB).
To me, the star rankings and any average star rankings are basically worthless. But I understand why they use them.
What is more impressive to me is that we have 9 players who rank in the top 70 nationally for their position, with 7 falling in the top 50. That's something to get excited about IMHO.
Any thoughts?