Page 1 of 1

SMU's HS Class Rates Favorably

PostPosted: Tue Jan 13, 2004 10:03 am
by Stallion
I have mentioned several times that I thought SMU's HIGH SCHOOL ONLY class rates favorably with the classes of TCU, Baylor, UH, and Rice. In high school recruiting only SMU holds a slight edge over each school based on the more precise secondary rating used by Rivals. The following are the ratings with numbers of HS recruits in parenthesis. SMU 5.28(10), TCU 5.24(12), Baylor 5.15(10), UH 5.13(12)Rice-(really struggling). However, to be fair especially to the Froggies TCU's best recruits are JC players not included in this scale. Surprisingly, competitive is Tulsa at 5.2(13) and that doesn't include 3 three star JUCOs.

<small>[ 01-13-2004, 07:22 AM: Message edited by: Stallion ]</small>

Re: SMU's HS Class Rates Favorably

PostPosted: Tue Jan 13, 2004 10:06 am
by PerunaPunch
Stallion,

Can you pull those same stats to compare between our class and the CUSA schools we'll be facing in another couple of years?

Re: SMU's HS Class Rates Favorably

PostPosted: Tue Jan 13, 2004 10:22 am
by dandyfan
i just saw jon lindley, of sulphur springs, on a basketball court. He is taller than i had expected and his quickness is just plain out of this world. looks like another nice east texas pick up.

Re: SMU's HS Class Rates Favorably

PostPosted: Tue Jan 13, 2004 5:07 pm
by Southland
Originally posted by Stallion:
I have mentioned several times that I thought SMU's HIGH SCHOOL ONLY class rates favorably with the classes of TCU, Baylor, UH, and Rice. In high school recruiting only SMU holds a slight edge over each school based on the more precise secondary rating used by Rivals. The following are the ratings with numbers of HS recruits in parenthesis. SMU 5.28(10), TCU 5.24(12), Baylor 5.15(10), UH 5.13(12)Rice-(really struggling). However, to be fair especially to the Froggies TCU's best recruits are JC players not included in this scale. Surprisingly, competitive is Tulsa at 5.2(13) and that doesn't include 3 three star JUCOs.
good news.

Not really surprised about Tulsa, since they are the #3 school in that state (as opposed to the seventh/eighth option like SMU, Houston, Rice, Baylor, etc.)

We'll become more successful on the JC level as years progress, and JUCO players realize that we're an option.

We're a redtag policy change away from creating something solid on the non-BCS level.

Re: SMU's HS Class Rates Favorably

PostPosted: Tue Jan 13, 2004 5:47 pm
by GoRedGoBlue
3rd in a state with 1/8th of the population

Originally posted by Southland:
Originally posted by Stallion:
[b] I have mentioned several times that I thought SMU's HIGH SCHOOL ONLY class rates favorably with the classes of TCU, Baylor, UH, and Rice. In high school recruiting only SMU holds a slight edge over each school based on the more precise secondary rating used by Rivals. The following are the ratings with numbers of HS recruits in parenthesis. SMU 5.28(10), TCU 5.24(12), Baylor 5.15(10), UH 5.13(12)Rice-(really struggling). However, to be fair especially to the Froggies TCU's best recruits are JC players not included in this scale. Surprisingly, competitive is Tulsa at 5.2(13) and that doesn't include 3 three star JUCOs.
good news.

Not really surprised about Tulsa, since they are the #3 school in that state (as opposed to the seventh/eighth option like SMU, Houston, Rice, Baylor, etc.)

We'll become more successful on the JC level as years progress, and JUCO players realize that we're an option.

We're a redtag policy change away from creating something solid on the non-BCS level. [/b]

Re: SMU's HS Class Rates Favorably

PostPosted: Tue Jan 13, 2004 5:51 pm
by GrapevineMustang
Originally posted by dandyfan:
i just saw jon lindley, of sulphur springs, on a basketball court. He is taller than i had expected and his quickness is just plain out of this world. looks like another nice east texas pick up.
I get the impression that he's really impressive. It's good to hear about that quickness, considering he suffered a miniscus injury in his knee in SSHS's season-ending playoff loss to Highland Park.

So how tall is he? I've seen him listed everywhere from 5-10 to 6-1.5. Could you get an accurate read on the guy?

Re: SMU's HS Class Rates Favorably

PostPosted: Tue Jan 13, 2004 6:06 pm
by Stallion
6 out of Tulsa's 16 HS recruits are from our own DFW Metroplex including recognized recruits like S Randy Duncan, S Curtis Williams and DT Tommy Daniels.

Re: SMU's HS Class Rates Favorably

PostPosted: Tue Jan 13, 2004 7:05 pm
by Southland
Originally posted by GoRedGoBlue:
3rd in a state with 1/8th of the population

Originally posted by Southland:
[b]
Originally posted by Stallion:
[b] I have mentioned several times that I thought SMU's HIGH SCHOOL ONLY class rates favorably with the classes of TCU, Baylor, UH, and Rice. In high school recruiting only SMU holds a slight edge over each school based on the more precise secondary rating used by Rivals. The following are the ratings with numbers of HS recruits in parenthesis. SMU 5.28(10), TCU 5.24(12), Baylor 5.15(10), UH 5.13(12)Rice-(really struggling). However, to be fair especially to the Froggies TCU's best recruits are JC players not included in this scale. Surprisingly, competitive is Tulsa at 5.2(13) and that doesn't include 3 three star JUCOs.
good news.

Not really surprised about Tulsa, since they are the #3 school in that state (as opposed to the seventh/eighth option like SMU, Houston, Rice, Baylor, etc.)

We'll become more successful on the JC level as years progress, and JUCO players realize that we're an option.

We're a redtag policy change away from creating something solid on the non-BCS level. [/b]
[/b]
Lot of good football players in Oklahoma, and OU and OSU can't accommodate all the Oklahomans that wants to stay in state. Naturally, they turn to Tulsa next.

Whereas a Texan who wants to stay in state can turn to eight different schools if Texas or Texas A&M aren't interested.

Re: SMU's HS Class Rates Favorably

PostPosted: Wed Jan 14, 2004 12:41 pm
by dandyfan
I get the impression that he's really impressive. It's good to hear about that quickness, considering he suffered a miniscus injury in his knee in SSHS's season-ending playoff loss to Highland Park.

So how tall is he? I've seen him listed everywhere from 5-10 to 6-1.5. Could you get an accurate read on the guy?

GM,Jon is a legit 5'11'' to 6'0''. And I honestly forgot about the knee injury. He was not wearing a sleeve or anything on the knee so I am assuming he is fully recovered.

Re: SMU's HS Class Rates Favorably

PostPosted: Sat Jan 24, 2004 10:56 am
by Jake Spavital
asdfasdf

Re: SMU's HS Class Rates Favorably

PostPosted: Sat Jan 24, 2004 1:01 pm
by DallasDiehard
Huh? Is there a secret message encoded there?