Dontae Livingston

Starting at right tackle at ECU. Bummer it didn't work here for him. Our OL could use him right now. Guess he had some growing up to do first. Seems like it's working out for the best for him. And ECU looks very good right now.
ClickClack wrote:Its too bad the Klemm recruits who play for our O Line suck, but we don't have any other options due to barely recruiting OL in the previous classes.
Stallion wrote:Oh I forgot some that aren't listed under Klemm but if you read the stories they committed to him and listed him as a major reason:
Gottschalk
--------------
Lasecki
Weeks
Briggs-committed months before Klemm left
Myers-committed months before Klemm left, decommitted then committed after Klemm left
Stallion wrote:Oh I forgot some that aren't listed under Klemm but if you read the stories they committed to him and listed him as a major reason:
Gottschalk
--------------
Lasecki
Weeks
Briggs-committed months before Klemm left
Myers-committed months before Klemm left, decommitted then committed after Klemm left
Stallion wrote:Along with Robert Lewis at WSU and Levingstone at ECU that probably makes about 14 or 15th Klemm commit to start at the Division 1A Level. Where are those critics that criticized the quality of his recruits? I remember suggesting they get their shots in early because they are going to look pretty silly in a few years. They are still criticizing him because some freshman and sophomore OLM recruits at UCLA are young and inexperienced. In 2 years UCLA will have a dominant OLine and we'll revisit it again
Rebel10 wrote:Klemm is also responsible for Briggs.
Rebel10 wrote:By the way our lower profile diamond in the rough recruits are not working out so well either.
Stallion wrote:We've already clearly proven that wasn't Klemm's fault other than he took a different job.
Stallion wrote:June taking 2 Offensive Lineman (including hitting on Gottschalk) in 2010 while taking seemingly a never ending list of mini-me receivers in recent years and striking out with JUCOs since then is the problem.
ojaipony wrote:But if you only get 3-4 decent in a class and the rest are diamond in the rough, then you get in trouble after a few years in a row of that which is where we are right now. Also, some of it is just bad luck in SMU's case (2010 and 2011 classes).
Stallion wrote:Thanks to Rebel10 for finding that January 21, 2012 thread-here I am issuing the warning alarm about our Offensive Line recruiting. After this date SMU started a string of mediocre Offensive Line commits that probably were not even in their Top 50 on their Draft Board (if they were organized enough to even have a Draft Board). Those kids would be 3rd year players right now. Recruiting failure.
Postby Stallion » Sat Jan 21, 2012 5:49 pm
PRIME EXAMPLE NO.!:
Believe it of not but SMU has offered 38 Offensive Lineman this year at a targeted position and right now has only 2 solid commitments at that position. Both are Diamonds in the rough recruited by few if any reputable schools. Most of these Linemen were identified and offered before the 2 we got. Can you really sit there and claim that SMU is getting the Offensive Linemen they really want and that June Jones' opinion should be elevated above the opinions of the 36 schools where these other recruits committed? That's laughable. That's going pretty DEEEEEEEEPPPPPP on the June Jones'recruiting board-I'm not sure I've seen anything like it.
PerunaPunch wrote:Rebel10 wrote:Klemm is also responsible for Briggs.
Do you think he would start for Baylor or A&M? Maybe UNT... But that's precisely my point. Scouting report is that Briggs may be something special.