SFA 61, SMU 58

[regis]

SFA is 11-1 for a reason. They are a good ball club and wil probably win thier league.

This was not a terrible loss for us. They guys fought hard throughout. They could have given up when every ridiculous three ball went in for SFA, but they didn't. With a lucky bounce or an actual good call by those officials, we'd have beat em.

This team is growing and should be competitive for the conference schedule.

[QuikSStang]

This team is growing and should be competitive for the conference schedule.

i thought so last year. we are going to have a miserable time in conference, i am afraid

[papawasamustang]

The team plays pretty good D but it all comes down to putting the ball in the hole & this team appears to have the same problems they had last year, ballhandling & scoring. I can see Doh's committment to controlling the tempo keeping them in games vs. Rice, Marshall, ECU, Tulsa, UTEP etc.
Other than Memphis, UAB & Houston its really going to be very competitive for that next level in the standinds with Southern Miss & UCF possibly being the best of that group.
Hey, anythings possible when you lace em up. Hopefully it will be fun & we turn out to be the big surprise of CUSA this year.

[The XtC]

[quote="regis"]SFA is 11-1 for a reason. They are a good ball club and wil probably win thier league.
[/quote]

No. If there is a clear frontrunner in the Southland, it's Sam Houston. SFA is solid, but they will be fighting UTA for 2nd place. After those 3 and maybe Central Arkansas the Southland takes a nosedive. SFA should be in the post season, though, they'll challenge for the auto-bid out of their tournament, and if they dont get it I could see them in the NIT.