|
PonyFans.com •
Board Index •
Around the Hilltop •
Football •
Recruiting •
Basketball •
Other Sports
Anything involving SMU basketball belongs here.
Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower
by SMU Football Blog » Wed Apr 19, 2006 10:29 am
One question keeps crossing my mind. At some point, possibly as late as this Summer, an NCAA report on SMU basketball will come out. Putting aside the punishment for a moment, there are two ways it can go. First, there is the "burgers and cheer" report and not much more. Second, there is something new that is also significant.
We have certainly been led to believe by SMU that the latter is the case. So, assuming there is more to it, are ye of the "burgers and cheer" crowd willing to accept whaterver findings the NCAA sets forth? Or are you going to suggest a broader conspiracy between SMU, the NCAA and others to get Tubbs? Are you going to suggest that SMU orchestrated a broader scandal with the possible significant NCAA ramifications solely to besmirch Tubbs?
Also, I find it interesting that nobody has discussed the impact of this possibility and a possible punishment on SMU basketball affecting SMU's ability to attract a new coach.
-

SMU Football Blog

-
- Posts: 4418
- Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 1:44 pm
- Location: North Dallas, Texas
-
by McClown27 » Wed Apr 19, 2006 10:34 am
I would guess we will banned from postseason play next year. For those in love with the Dement/Tubbs era, this shouldn't be too severe.
Willis to slot receiver!
-

McClown27

-
- Posts: 1030
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2005 6:07 pm
-
by jtstang » Wed Apr 19, 2006 10:37 am
SMU Football Blog wrote:One question keeps crossing my mind. At some point, possibly as late as this Summer, an NCAA report on SMU basketball will come out. Putting aside the punishment for a moment, there are two ways it can go. First, there is the "burgers and cheer" report and not much more. Second, there is something new that is also significant.
We have certainly been led to believe by SMU that the latter is the case. So, assuming there is more to it, are ye of the "burgers and cheer" crowd willing to accept whaterver findings the NCAA sets forth? Or are you going to suggest a broader conspiracy between SMU, the NCAA and others to get Tubbs? Are you going to suggest that SMU orchestrated a broader scandal with the possible significant NCAA ramifications solely to besmirch Tubbs?
Also, I find it interesting that nobody has discussed the impact of this possibility and a possible punishment on SMU basketball affecting SMU's ability to attract a new coach.
Hey, whatever happened, happened. If it is more than burgers and Cheer then I will stand bemused by the fact that SMU allowed itself to be shamed by the perpetuation of the burgers and Cheer story, rather than telling the real reasons when they fired him. Can you recall the last time a div 1 coach was fired where the explanation for his firing was not given concurrently?
Answer this: if the NCAA report is nothing more than burgers and Cheer will you be willing to accept the fact that SMU is gutless?
-

jtstang

-
- Posts: 11161
- Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2004 10:21 am
- Location: Dallas, TX
by jtstang » Wed Apr 19, 2006 10:38 am
McClown27 wrote:I would guess we will banned from postseason play next year. For those in love with the Dement/Tubbs era, this shouldn't be too severe.
You don't even know what the violations are, sunshiner.
-

jtstang

-
- Posts: 11161
- Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2004 10:21 am
- Location: Dallas, TX
by abezontar » Wed Apr 19, 2006 10:39 am
I think jtstang has exclusive rights to the phrase "burgers and cheer" it would probably be advisable to use another brand, perhaps burgers and tide, or burgers and downy.....just a suggestion
The donkey's name is Kiki.
On a side note, anybody need a patent attorney?
Good, Bad...I'm the one with the gun.
-

abezontar

-
- Posts: 3888
- Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2002 4:01 am
- Location: Mustang, TX
by SMU Football Blog » Wed Apr 19, 2006 10:39 am
jtstang wrote:Answer this: if the NCAA report is nothing more than burgers and Cheer will you be willing to accept the fact that SMU is gutless?
Brother, that assumes I don't already think SMU is gutless.
-

SMU Football Blog

-
- Posts: 4418
- Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 1:44 pm
- Location: North Dallas, Texas
-
by Hoop Fan » Wed Apr 19, 2006 10:40 am
yes, I will accept the NCAA findings. I would even accept at face value SMU's findings. I really don't think there is any rule against self-reporting violations and publicizing them and taking your medicine if they are substantiated. That is what SMU should have done from the start and what they should do now. Now, if there are unsubstaniated allegations which caused you to act, that becomes a problem.
-
Hoop Fan

-
- Posts: 6814
- Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2000 4:01 am
by SMU Football Blog » Wed Apr 19, 2006 10:40 am
abezontar wrote:I think jtstang has exclusive rights to the phrase "burgers and cheer" it would probably be advisable to use another brand, perhaps burgers and tide, or burgers and downy.....just a suggestion
I acquired a non-exclusive license through assignment from a recent acquisition.
-

SMU Football Blog

-
- Posts: 4418
- Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 1:44 pm
- Location: North Dallas, Texas
-
by jtstang » Wed Apr 19, 2006 10:41 am
SMU Football Blog wrote:Brother, that assumes I don't already think SMU is gutless.
Well anybody that will fire a guy after two years for not turning around the program that Tubbs inherited truly is. I hope the "big name" coach SMU wants is cognizant of who he's going to work for.
-

jtstang

-
- Posts: 11161
- Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2004 10:21 am
- Location: Dallas, TX
by Stallion » Wed Apr 19, 2006 10:42 am
I don't think anybody is saying that at. What they are saying is that SMU handled this situation incredibly badly. There is no rational justification for Tubbs' firing that has been stated publicly-therefore its a Public Relations nightmare-one that will follow SMU for decades-despite the simply stupid insinuations that this will have no effect on Dallas recruiting. Most of the people saying that have not the slightest idea of what they are talking about. Remember I was the first to insist that Tubbs should be fired by sundown if there were signs of a slush fund or unrestricted cash funds for all those burgers and detergent. The general reasons for his dismissal need to be made public-its a farce to suggest that the NCAA is preventing a general statement of the reasons for Tubbs dismissal.
-
Stallion

-
- Posts: 44302
- Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2000 4:01 am
- Location: Dallas,Texas,USA
by jtstang » Wed Apr 19, 2006 10:43 am
SMU Football Blog wrote:abezontar wrote:I think jtstang has exclusive rights to the phrase "burgers and cheer" it would probably be advisable to use another brand, perhaps burgers and tide, or burgers and downy.....just a suggestion
I acquired a non-exclusive license through assignment from a recent acquisition.
Yes, but you'll need to send me a quarter every time you use it. I may use the money to upgrade mrydel's seats next year.
-

jtstang

-
- Posts: 11161
- Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2004 10:21 am
- Location: Dallas, TX
by SMU Football Blog » Wed Apr 19, 2006 10:44 am
jtstang wrote:SMU Football Blog wrote:Brother, that assumes I don't already think SMU is gutless.
Well anybody that will fire a guy after two years for not turning around the program that Tubbs inherited truly is. I hope the "big name" coach SMU wants is cognizant of who he's going to work for.
I never said I would have fired him. I did say I never would have hired him. And I will say I can see an argument for any number of scenarios that could have happened after the last day of the season whether it was firing, keeping or extending Tubbs.
-

SMU Football Blog

-
- Posts: 4418
- Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 1:44 pm
- Location: North Dallas, Texas
-
by abezontar » Wed Apr 19, 2006 10:46 am
jtstang wrote:SMU Football Blog wrote:abezontar wrote:I think jtstang has exclusive rights to the phrase "burgers and cheer" it would probably be advisable to use another brand, perhaps burgers and tide, or burgers and downy.....just a suggestion
I acquired a non-exclusive license through assignment from a recent acquisition.
Yes, but you'll need to send me a quarter every time you use it. I may use the money to upgrade mrydel's seats next year.

The donkey's name is Kiki.
On a side note, anybody need a patent attorney?
Good, Bad...I'm the one with the gun.
-

abezontar

-
- Posts: 3888
- Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2002 4:01 am
- Location: Mustang, TX
by SMU Football Blog » Wed Apr 19, 2006 10:53 am
Stallion, you were not a person whose name came to mind when this thread was started.
As for a public relations nightmare, from the day he was hired, I believed that whenever (if) SMU chose to let Tubbs go, it would end badly, even if he were given ten years and never produced anything. The DISD HS coaches were always going to be PO'd. Is this worse? Yes, but not appreciably so, IMO.
-

SMU Football Blog

-
- Posts: 4418
- Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 1:44 pm
- Location: North Dallas, Texas
-
by jtstang » Wed Apr 19, 2006 10:54 am
SMU Football Blog wrote:I never said I would have fired him. I did say I never would have hired him. And I will say I can see an argument for any number of scenarios that could have happened after the last day of the season whether it was firing, keeping or extending Tubbs.
Well, the argument which won out was to fire him. And the only portion of that argument made public at the time he was fired was, unfortunately, burgers and Cheer.
-

jtstang

-
- Posts: 11161
- Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2004 10:21 am
- Location: Dallas, TX
Return to Basketball
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests
|
|