Danny Noonan wrote:Hoop Fan wrote:WildBillPony wrote:Boy, it does make one stop and think about the old pattern theory. The old carrry over from the Oklahoma stuff. You think Indiana is sweating their decision to hire Simpson. Something tells me they aren't giving it a second thought. Sampson was their man. Tthey went out and got him. They are not worrying about some NCAA investigation carying over to them.
You would think that if anyone would be concerned it would be Indiana. They hired the head coach from the time period all the infractions were supposedly taking place for Pete's sake. You think they give a rat's [deleted]?
Only at SMU. It does get tiresome doesn't it?
Bingo. You got it Wildbill. Thank you for injecting some common sense.
So guys, should we have done nothing? If you say we should
n't have, it'll at least clear up where you're coming from.
I've stated where I am coming from on this several times. OU has multiple assistants involved over time. That is the head coach's problem, not the assistants. If Tubbs was a renegade assistant ala Malin, then maybe SMU should weigh it heavily. As it appears, the OU incident better not be weighing heavily on SMU's decision. Thats why IU hiring Sampson is a huge point here.