|
SMU Needs A Builder, Not Just A NameModerators: PonyPride, SmooPower
25 posts
• Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Re: SMU Needs A Builder, Not Just A NameLooks like I have higher standards and goals for the program. He was a complete failure my man.
Re: SMU Needs A Builder, Not Just A Name
No, you like beating a dead horse. There is a difference between the individual and program. The program isn't in shambles, the individual was a mess. He did do some legit things for the school/program off the court, but I'm not defending his on-court record. It's just time to move on. He doesn't coach here anymore, and he left the cupboard far more stocked than he found it. Sure we lost a bunch of time, but shambles was your word
Re: SMU Needs A Builder, Not Just A NameIndeed. Only place to go is up. Can't go any lower.
SMU Needs A Builder, Not Just A Name
As in top 25?
Re: SMU Needs A Builder, Not Just A Name
Meow! Pony Up
Re: SMU Needs A Builder, Not Just A NameTop 25 in everything we do. If you say it enough, will it happen?
Re: SMU Needs A Builder, Not Just A Name
Certainly can't hurt.
Re: SMU Needs A Builder, Not Just A Name
No one is claiming Doherty's tenure a success. It was a a failure. That is why he was fired. In spite of that failure, our program is far ahead of where it was when he took over. Doherty's tenure brought us significant facility upgrades, left us with a more talented roster than he inherited, and helped repair a toxic relationship in Dallas to the tune of quite a few local players on the roster. We are much better today as a program than the day before Doherty arrived at SMU. Also, we didn't come in last place.
Re: SMU Needs A Builder, Not Just A NameMy bad. Next to last place. Let's celebrate. Don't lower your standards.
Re: SMU Needs A Builder, Not Just A NameIf he developed good DISD relationships, he sure got left at the altar vs. Jackson State.
25 posts
• Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Who is onlineUsers browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest |
|