USF04 wrote:The selection committee uses RPI as the base for seeding teams because it allows for unbiased views.
For example, most college bball fans would blindly say Louisville is a top 2 seed. However, when you look at their true resume, it's easy to see that they haven't done anything amazing. In fact, the only difference between SMU and Louisville is that Louisville lost to teams with higher RPIs.
While I somewhat agree with your assessment of the Big 12, you are leaving out Iowa State. Pretty much 40% of their conference is playing at an elite level....and OU and Texas have good resumes as well. Now their bottom 4 teams definitely stink. They will get half of their teams in the NCAA.
Big XII
#2 - Kansas
#5 - IA State
#9 - Baylor
#13 - Oklahoma State
#33 - Texas
#45 - Oklahoma
Unbiased views? That may be the intent of the rpi buts it's far from its reality. Forgot Iowa st and Texas can blow me, as can ou. They have no business getting half their teams in.