mrydel wrote:The women are used to dealing with 30 second experiences.

|
Would a Larry Brown Coached SMU Benefit from :30 ClockModerators: PonyPride, SmooPower
18 posts
• Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Re: Would a Larry Brown Coached SMU Benefit from :30 Clock
![]() BOP - Providing insensitivity training for a politically correct world since 1989.
Re: Would a Larry Brown Coached SMU Benefit from :30 ClockOf course, that would cause even more angst and despair among excitable SMU fans due to increased 3 point shots although in reality SMU is back in Top 20% in 3 Point Defensive FG % ranked 67th in Country out of 345 teams (top 19%)
BTW despite what you read on ponyfans there is no shotage of NCAA Tournament teams that have worse 3 Point Defensive %-in fact we are in good company sitting just a tick below Duke At a minimum there are at least 34 NCAA Tournament teams with worse 3 Point FG % including numerous Top 25 teams-and I'm sure I missed a bunch of smaller schools from 1 bid conferences UCLA in particular is sitting at No. 246 in the Country "With a quarter of a tank of gas, we can get everything we need right here in DFW." -SMU Head Coach Chad Morris
When momentum starts rolling downhill in recruiting-WATCH OUT.
Re: Would a Larry Brown Coached SMU Benefit from :30 ClockA 30 second clock would help us immensely. Our defense already gets 2-3 violations per game. Basically the s**t starts to hit the fan for the other team with about 7 seconds left on the shot clock. So we get the opportunity for the s**t to hit the fan five seconds earlier every single time the other team has the ball.
I like that. On offense: we already pass up a lot of shots looking for a chance at a better one. And we pass…a lot…we'll be just fine. Party at The Wopper!
18 posts
• Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Who is onlineUsers browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests |
|