Bracketology

by **GiddyUp** » Sun Mar 16, 2014 1:16 pm

if only we had beaten UVA, that would have been huge.

by **LHS81** » Sun Mar 16, 2014 1:26 pm

Harry0569 wrote:
Terry Webster wrote:I think that is UK beats Florida today they will probably jump up to a 5.

After watching both teams live yesterday, I can assure you that UK will not beat UK today (I am headed down there today too).

UK is long and athletic EVERYWHERE, but they run literally zero offensive sets. If the first option on the post is denied, their o devolves into one on one hero ball with one of the Harrison twins driving or Randle putting his head down and driving like a mack truck. They also don't shoot the ball from 3 well outside of James Young.

If we do play them, we need to pack the paint and force the Harrison twins to hit mid-range shots / 3s.

After watching both teams live yesterday, I can assure you that UK will not beat UK today (I am headed down there today too).
Which UK should I pull for

by **LA_Mustang** » Sun Mar 16, 2014 1:57 pm

Lunardi now has:
6 Kentucky
11 SMU
In San Antonio

Please, please let this happen!

by **gostangs** » Sun Mar 16, 2014 2:15 pm

How many SMU fans could we get to San Antonio? 5k? More?

by **CoxMustangFan** » Sun Mar 16, 2014 2:16 pm

gostangs wrote:How many SMU fans could we get to San Antonio? 5k? More?

SA would be great. I'm 99% in if it's in SA.

by **StandUp** » Sun Mar 16, 2014 2:23 pm

I am definitely thinking that the tournament committee will have us playing either Kentucky in the first round or Kansas in the second round. Due to LB's coaching tree. A Kentucky Matchup would really provide media attention. Could be really great media exposure for our program. We are capable of beating Kentucky and Kansas on a good day. Anything can happen in the tournament! It is put up or shut up time. Win and advance. Pony Up!

by **bsturman** » Sun Mar 16, 2014 2:42 pm

How accurate is lunardi's projections? I don't know if I have ever watched it this closely so no clue if he is really in the know or not

by **Terry Webster** » Sun Mar 16, 2014 2:45 pm

Not that it matters, but Bleacher Report (?) has SMU as the last team in, playing Xavier in round 1 with the winner getting Ohio State.

by **MFFL02** » Sun Mar 16, 2014 2:46 pm

bsturman wrote:How accurate is lunardi's projections? I don't know if I have ever watched it this closely so no clue if he is really in the know or not

Last year he got 68 of 68 correct.

by **MFFL02** » Sun Mar 16, 2014 2:46 pm

LA_Mustang wrote:Lunardi now has:
6 Kentucky
11 SMU
In San Antonio

Please, please let this happen!

Kentucky is playing much better than a 6-seed at the moment.

by **CoxMustangFan** » Sun Mar 16, 2014 2:48 pm

MFFL02 wrote:
LA_Mustang wrote:Lunardi now has:
6 Kentucky
11 SMU
In San Antonio

Please, please let this happen!

Kentucky is playing much better than a 6-seed at the moment.

It would be a total [deleted] draw for SMU...as would be the team that draws Ok Lite at a 8/9.

by **bsturman** » Sun Mar 16, 2014 2:49 pm

MFFL02 wrote:
bsturman wrote:How accurate is lunardi's projections? I don't know if I have ever watched it this closely so no clue if he is really in the know or not

Last year he got 68 of 68 correct.

Damn.. I like it!!!

by **Nacho** » Sun Mar 16, 2014 2:53 pm

Bleacher report
Really?!

by **Terry Webster** » Sun Mar 16, 2014 2:54 pm

Nacho wrote:Bleacher report
Really?!

Didn't say it was good or accurate, just throwing it out there.

by **ponyte** » Sun Mar 16, 2014 2:55 pm

ULaLa just made it in the Tourney As the Sun Belt tourney winner. mrydel and I watched them play UALR earlier this year. I doubt they make it past the first round.

Bracketology

Re: Bracketology

Re: Bracketology

Re: Bracketology

Re: Bracketology

Re: Bracketology

Re: Bracketology

Re: Bracketology

Re: Bracketology

Re: Bracketology

Re: Bracketology

Re: Bracketology

Re: Bracketology

Re: Bracketology

Re: Bracketology

Re: Bracketology

Who is online