Bracketology

by **SMU 86** » Sun Mar 16, 2014 3:38 pm

Just over an hour to go.

by **mrydel** » Sun Mar 16, 2014 3:39 pm

LA_Mustang wrote:I thought so too, Cox. But all of the "experts" except Lunardi have us in the play-in game.

The play in games (1st round) are between the 4 lowest ranked conference tournament winners and 4 lowest ranked selected. I have not seen any list with us as the last 4 in. Granted I have not seemed them all, but I have not heard us in the last 4 in conversation.

by **ponyscott** » Sun Mar 16, 2014 3:40 pm

GiddyUp wrote:Pitino just said we are one of the"ugliest" environments whatever that means. The lobster and Mario must have said some things

Loved Patino"s eyes after he said that....

by **b_caesar** » Sun Mar 16, 2014 3:41 pm

GiddyUp wrote:Pitino just said we are one of the"ugliest" environments whatever that means. The lobster and Mario must have said some things

Saw that, too - Betting he's glad he doesn't have to come back... and I'm sure he was using the term "ugliest" in the most complimentary way possible...

by **gostangs** » Sun Mar 16, 2014 3:47 pm

there was lots of discussion about Mr Pitino's personal life that he did not find quite as amusing as the student section.

by **PonyKris89** » Sun Mar 16, 2014 3:48 pm

mrydel wrote:
LA_Mustang wrote:I thought so too, Cox. But all of the "experts" except Lunardi have us in the play-in game.

The play in games (1st round) are between the 4 lowest ranked conference tournament winners and 4 lowest ranked selected. I have not seen any list with us as the last 4 in. Granted I have not seemed them all, but I have not heard us in the last 4 in conversation.

Jerry Palm at CBSports has had us as last four in since we lost to UH. actually a fair amount of predictors have SMU as last 4 in. Play in vs Xavier in Ohio would be bad news.

by **ojaipony** » Sun Mar 16, 2014 3:50 pm

gostangs wrote:there was lots of discussion about Mr Pitino's personal life that he did not find quite as amusing as the student section.

You make your bed, you have to sleep in it. Sorry for reporting the facts [deleted].

by **PonyKris89** » Sun Mar 16, 2014 4:36 pm

Lunardi just changed projected SMU draw again.

Now has 11 SMU vs. 6 VCU in SanAntonio, winner gets possibly #3 Iowa St.

by **Hoop Fan** » Sun Mar 16, 2014 4:42 pm

Jerry Palm said that we only have 4 top 50 wins so we are a bubble team that deserves to be left out. Virginia has 5 top 50 wins but they are likely 1 seed. bracketology is a funny thing.

by **Smu97186** » Sun Mar 16, 2014 4:45 pm

4 top 36 wins actually

by **CalallenStang** » Sun Mar 16, 2014 4:49 pm

PonyKris89 wrote:Lunardi just changed projected SMU draw again.

Now has 11 SMU vs. 6 VCU in SanAntonio, winner gets possibly #3 Iowa St.

We would get killed vs Havoc unless we have been non-stop practicing vs pressure

by **PonyKris89** » Sun Mar 16, 2014 4:54 pm

Hoop Fan wrote:Jerry Palm said that we only have 4 top 50 wins so we are a bubble team that deserves to be left out. Virginia has 5 top 50 wins but they are likely 1 seed. bracketology is a funny thing.

Love Jerry's Dumb and Dumber hair.

by **SMUstangs22** » Sun Mar 16, 2014 4:55 pm

I think the SMUs should be out? Eff him, our resume stands up against other bubbles.

by **LHS81** » Sun Mar 16, 2014 4:57 pm

Doug Gottlieb thinks Southern Miss, La Tech should be in. . . "SMU's of the world should be out!"

by **Smu97186** » Sun Mar 16, 2014 4:57 pm

People need to stop generalizing top 100 wins. A win vs cincy means a lot more than a win against st bonaventure

Bracketology

Re: Bracketology

Re: Bracketology

Re: Bracketology

Re: Bracketology

Re: Bracketology

Re: Bracketology

Re: Bracketology

Re: Bracketology

Re: Bracketology

Re: Bracketology

Re: Bracketology

Re: Bracketology

Re: Bracketology

Re: Bracketology

Re: Bracketology

Who is online