|
PonyFans.com •
Board Index •
Around the Hilltop •
Football •
Recruiting •
Basketball •
Other Sports
Anything involving SMU basketball belongs here.
Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower
by PonyPride » Fri Jan 06, 2023 1:26 pm
geezerdonk wrote:A truly disgraceful effort by the players and especially the head coach. The women's team would have been more competitive - much more competitive. Doubled up in rebounding. There is a lot more of this humiliation and embarrassment coming down the pike - starting with super size helping tomorrow.
The women lost at Houston (60-44)
PonyFans.com ... is really the premier place for Mustang talk on the Web. — New York Times
https://www.facebook.com/PonyFanscom/
twitter.com/PonyFans
https://www.instagram.com/ponyfans_staff/
threads.com/ponyfans_staff
-

PonyPride

-
- Posts: 22351
- Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2000 4:01 am
- Location: Dallas, Texas
-
by tristatecoog » Fri Jan 06, 2023 5:14 pm
geezerdonk has very cold and tiresome takes.
I heard the stat that UH has taken down opponents' top scorer by 5.5 points on average. While they contained Zhuric, it was more than solid defense. Isn't he still recovering? Williamson was in a mismatch with a super hot Jarace Walker who may be catching fire.
Lanier came late and cobbled together a lot of guys who'll work hard. The Hawaii tournament and USF was real progress but there's still a lot of roster work going on.
I wouldn't count on a game at UCF telling a lot. The Knights are the second highest rated team in the AAC and this is on the road. Play hard but chalk up these two road games as a humbling measuring stick. I suspect SMU holds UH to under a ten point margin at home and will be a middle of the road AAC team in year one of Lanier's tenure. Not a surprise with a new coach. Last night's announcers were very familiar with Rob Lanier and expect good things in the future.
-
tristatecoog

-
- Posts: 3007
- Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2000 3:01 am
- Location: Dallas, TX
by Charleston Pony » Fri Jan 06, 2023 5:42 pm
tristatecoog wrote:geezerdonk has very cold and tiresome takes.
I heard the stat that UH has taken down opponents' top scorer by 5.5 points on average. While they contained Zhuric, it was more than solid defense. Isn't he still recovering? Williamson was in a mismatch with a super hot Jarace Walker who may be catching fire.
Lanier came late and cobbled together a lot of guys who'll work hard. The Hawaii tournament and USF was real progress but there's still a lot of roster work going on.
I wouldn't count on a game at UCF telling a lot. The Knights are the second highest rated team in the AAC and this is on the road. Play hard but chalk up these two road games as a humbling measuring stick. I suspect SMU holds UH to under a ten point margin at home and will be a middle of the road AAC team in year one of Lanier's tenure. Not a surprise with a new coach. Last night's announcers were very familiar with Rob Lanier and expect good things in the future.
That's pretty optimistic to think this team can play Houston to less than 10 points. I will believe it when I see it. The UCF will tell us a lot about whether this team believes it can actually compete against AAC teams like UCF, Memphis and the like who have more talented players than ours. It's always a character test to see whether your team plays [deleted] the road against teams they are unlikely to beat. Oh...and the ESPN announcers had a "dog" game to call and were looking for something nice to say about SMU. Time will tell whether Lanier can improve on what Jank accomplished here at SMU.
-
Charleston Pony

-
- Posts: 28903
- Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2000 3:01 am
- Location: Stonebridge Golf Club, NC
by mtrout » Fri Jan 06, 2023 6:33 pm
Well Lanier is certainly not Sonny Dykes-ing the mad scientist.
-
mtrout

-
- Posts: 2314
- Joined: Thu Feb 18, 2016 9:36 pm
by JasonB » Fri Jan 06, 2023 11:19 pm
Here is my take: - First of all, Houston is really starting to gel. And yes, I get that they are a top ranked team, but remember they lost 4 starters. They are only now really putting everything together. They have the size and athleticism of an NBA team across the board, and their frosh is amazing. I think they might be Saaser = Anthony and Walker = LJ good. - Houston also came to play, and SMU couldn't handle the physicality and size. The fact that we are a long team and Houston dominated us that much length wise is pretty impressive. - Williamson is probably our best defensive player, and got absolutely abused by Walker. It shows you how "on" Houston was.
I expected us to get blown out in that game. As I said in a different thread, the big test is going to be how we recover from it. Do we fight against UCF, Tulane, and Cincy, take two of three, and show that we are going to be in the mix for spots 2-4 in the conference. Or are we going to completely regress to pre-Hawaii, get blown out, and struggle to finish .500 in conference.
This is a big test for Lanier, because .500 in a down league is not going to sit well with anyone.
-
JasonB

-
- Posts: 7226
- Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2001 3:01 am
- Location: Allen, Tx, USA
by ponyboy » Sat Jan 07, 2023 12:25 pm
Feels like we’ve regressed in our estimate of where this team should be. I’d be happy .500 in this league as long as we are improving as the year goes along. Pinning a success ultimatum now doesn’t seem wise.
Having said all that, I do think we rebound from this loss.
-
ponyboy

-
- Posts: 15134
- Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2000 4:01 am
- Location: University Park,TX US
by Topper » Sun Jan 08, 2023 11:48 am
I have never claimed to be a basketball expert although I have watched SMU basketball faithfully since the 1960s. What I can't help but wonder is this: Wouldn't we be better off with Kendric and Bandoumel on our roster this year and if so, how did we let them get away? Do they just not fit in with Lanier's system? I don't see a talent upgrade without them.
-

Topper

-
- Posts: 2303
- Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2003 3:01 am
- Location: 19th Hole
by WildHorse » Sun Jan 08, 2023 3:23 pm
I have heard from several people that one or both would have stayed if Jankovich had stayed. Both were close with him. That's not saying Jank should have been kept, but if he had, they might have stayed, too. Instead, we're looking at the return of the Doherty offense.
Go PONIES!
-

WildHorse

-
- Posts: 749
- Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2000 3:01 am
- Location: Arlington, Texas
by Charleston Pony » Sun Jan 08, 2023 3:44 pm
WildHorse wrote:I have heard from several people that one or both would have stayed if Jankovich had stayed. Both were close with him. That's not saying Jank should have been kept, but if he had, they might have stayed, too. Instead, we're looking at the return of the Doherty offense.
I agree that Jank's leaving was the main reason those guys moved on but once the decision was made to move on from Jank, this program became a total tear down/rebuild so unfortunately this year is a write off. Pressure will be on Lanier to show tremendous improvement next year. We have a mid-level mid major roster that isn't going to be competitive in the AAC...not this year or next for that matter as UNT, FAU, Charlotte & UAB appear to have better programs than SMU right now
-
Charleston Pony

-
- Posts: 28903
- Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2000 3:01 am
- Location: Stonebridge Golf Club, NC
by Ikus » Mon Jan 09, 2023 3:10 pm
The last two games make you wonder how bad Tulsa is. After getting wrecked by Houston and UCF, how many remaining AAC games are winnable?
-

Ikus

-
- Posts: 1187
- Joined: Sun Jan 05, 2003 4:01 am
- Location: Dallas
by Charleston Pony » Mon Jan 09, 2023 6:01 pm
Ikus wrote:The last two games make you wonder how bad Tulsa is. After getting wrecked by Houston and UCF, how many remaining AAC games are winnable?
Games at Moody against lower level AAC teams will be our best hope for more Ws this season
-
Charleston Pony

-
- Posts: 28903
- Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2000 3:01 am
- Location: Stonebridge Golf Club, NC
by tristatecoog » Mon Jan 09, 2023 9:29 pm
https://masseyratings.com/500054/735850+% chance of winning: Both ECU games Both USF games At Tulsa Home against Temple, Tulane, Cincinnati, Wichita State So 9 conference games. Let’s see how it plays out.
-
tristatecoog

-
- Posts: 3007
- Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2000 3:01 am
- Location: Dallas, TX
by Charleston Pony » Mon Jan 09, 2023 10:11 pm
tristatecoog wrote:https://masseyratings.com/500054/7358
50+% chance of winning: Both ECU games Both USF games At Tulsa Home against Temple, Tulane, Cincinnati, Wichita State So 9 conference games. Let’s see how it plays out.
I don't see this team beating Tulane or Cincinnati even at Moody but with 4 of our next 6 games in Moody against these "beatable" teams our guys better win half of them if they want to avoid battling for the cellar of the AAC.
-
Charleston Pony

-
- Posts: 28903
- Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2000 3:01 am
- Location: Stonebridge Golf Club, NC
Return to Basketball
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests
|
|