PonyFans.comBoard IndexAround the HilltopFootballRecruitingBasketballOther Sports

OFFICIAL GAME 1 THREAD: Gardner Webb vs. SMU

Anything involving SMU basketball belongs here.

Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower

Re: OFFICIAL GAME 1 THREAD: Gardner Webb vs. SMU

Postby Stallion » Fri Nov 11, 2016 11:14 pm

Shake hasn't yet shown he's anywhere close to ready to be an NBA PG. Good basketball player but he's still in development stage if he wants to be a complete player. Its exciting to have an NBA prospect but I think he's got a ways to go
"With a quarter of a tank of gas, we can get everything we need right here in DFW." -SMU Head Coach Chad Morris

When momentum starts rolling downhill in recruiting-WATCH OUT.
Stallion
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 44302
Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2000 4:01 am
Location: Dallas,Texas,USA

Re: OFFICIAL GAME 1 THREAD: Gardner Webb vs. SMU

Postby Rebel10 » Fri Nov 11, 2016 11:20 pm

Shake is an NBA level shooting guard imo. But since he has to play the point this year his scoring production might be down a bit.
#HammerDown
Rebel10
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 12534
Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2009 10:20 pm

Re: OFFICIAL GAME 1 THREAD: Gardner Webb vs. SMU

Postby deucetz » Fri Nov 11, 2016 11:22 pm

Pony81 wrote:Shake looks like an NBA point guard with his length and athleticism..... But not a college point. College points are smaller and quicker to take advantage of other teams gaps in athleticism. Whereas NBA PG are ball distributors and 3 point shooters. Not necessarily penetrators - unless you are Kyrie Irivng.
Semi is the man. He and Shake will take over games this year. It will be quite a show. Ben Moore looked lost..... Needs to be in the high post not down on the blocks. Sterling did a great job slashing and being a catalyst around the ball .
Ben E. .? Not sure what his role is..... Maybe he spells Sterling and plays his role.

But we looked good against an opponent that ran out of gas in the 2nd half.


NBA points should be able to take advantage of gaps in college. Hope Shake gets better
deucetz
All-American
 
Posts: 628
Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2013 5:08 pm

Re: OFFICIAL GAME 1 THREAD: Gardner Webb vs. SMU

Postby Rebel10 » Fri Nov 11, 2016 11:23 pm

JasonB wrote:First half was ugly - they weren't posting anyone up, they had one guy at the free throw line, everone else on the perimeter and nobody was driving. Just bad offense.

Second half the spacing was much better and we took them off the dribble. Opened up space on the perimeter and allowed us to use our athleticism on the boards.

Really using Shake, Sterling, Gu as combo guards. No true point. Could be interesting but will hurt us in close games with nobody taking over.


The might one of the few times that we have agreed on everything.
#HammerDown
Rebel10
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 12534
Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2009 10:20 pm

Re: OFFICIAL GAME 1 THREAD: Gardner Webb vs. SMU

Postby LA_Mustang » Fri Nov 11, 2016 11:26 pm

Jarrey needs to be in the starting lineup. Dude is a baller.
SMU-12 NCAA appearances, 1 Final Four
2014-15 & 2016-17 AAC Men's Basketball Champs

Image
User avatar
LA_Mustang
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 15604
Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2002 4:01 am
Location: El Porto, CA 90266

Re: OFFICIAL GAME 1 THREAD: Gardner Webb vs. SMU

Postby Pony81 » Fri Nov 11, 2016 11:29 pm

I may be projecting Shake a bit but you can sure see the ability. He may not be an. NBA PG now but you can see a path. He will play in the league.
Semi and Shake together will be a load for any team.
Pony 81
Pony81
Heisman
 
Posts: 1353
Joined: Wed Oct 31, 2007 10:09 pm

Re: OFFICIAL GAME 1 THREAD: Gardner Webb vs. SMU

Postby Rebel10 » Fri Nov 11, 2016 11:29 pm

LA_Mustang wrote:Jarrey needs to be in the starting lineup. Dude is a baller.


Jarrey is definitely playing well.
#HammerDown
Rebel10
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 12534
Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2009 10:20 pm

Re: OFFICIAL GAME 1 THREAD: Gardner Webb vs. SMU

Postby Rebel10 » Fri Nov 11, 2016 11:31 pm

Looking at Harvard play Stanford now. Stanford has major length at every position.
#HammerDown
Rebel10
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 12534
Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2009 10:20 pm

Re: OFFICIAL GAME 1 THREAD: Gardner Webb vs. SMU

Postby JasonB » Sat Nov 12, 2016 12:22 am

Watching KU and IU, we lack quickness and inside size against the elite teams. The only player who looked quick was Foster. None of the 3 frosh looked ready to play at the college level, which is a huge concern. Hopefully they will smooth out by conference with experience, but Wilson has really skinny legs and Froling is not good at all defensively.

Two questions to be answered against good teams:
- Is our athleticism and length on the perimeter enough to allow us to play off the ball to both protect the inside and eliminate the speed dribble but still enable us to guard the 3.
- Is our size and athleticism enough to make up for the lack of speed when we try to dribble penetrate on offense. Can we muscle guys down into the paint to create space and then kick it out. It worked tonight in the second half; it will be interesting to see if it works against good teams.

I think we find out next week in NYC. That will be the difference between a team that goes a little over .500 in conference and one that can compete for the title.
JasonB
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 7226
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2001 3:01 am
Location: Allen, Tx, USA

Re: OFFICIAL GAME 1 THREAD: Gardner Webb vs. SMU

Postby PonyLawExpress » Sat Nov 12, 2016 12:34 am

Sloppy First half. Better in the second. I agree with most of what everyone has said. Jarrey had the foul trouble, but has to play more he looks poised to take a big step forward this year. Semi looks like he is gonna be a monster. Sterling looked more aggressive. Not worried about Ben. Ben E played okay overall, his offense doesn't look much improved, but hustles and plays good D. Shake will be an NBA player a likely first rounder one day, not ready to be an NBA PG yet (maybe SG). Excited to see how him and Semi play this year. The Frosh looked like Frosh BIG time. Wilson impressed me the most (even though he made alot of mistakes) he looks like when he gets comfortable he will have a role on this team. Fro trying not to react to just one game, but he really needs to reshape his body and work on quickness in the offseason. He seemed to work harder as the game went on.

Got the win. Will have an interesting test with EMU on Sunday before heading to MSQ. 1-0. PonyUp!
PonyLawExpress
Heisman
 
Posts: 1070
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 1:11 pm
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: OFFICIAL GAME 1 THREAD: Gardner Webb vs. SMU

Postby PonyUpPaula » Sat Nov 12, 2016 2:12 am

PonySnob wrote:Game production isn't on it's game yet either


I agree. It was awful. The atmosphere was so quiet and boring. Also, that entrance video was not as exciting as in the past. My family and I usually have fun, but my kids were begging me to leave. Very disappointing. I would also suggest getting the football DJ. He is much better.
PonyUpPaula
Newbie
 
Posts: 6
Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2016 9:29 pm

Re: OFFICIAL GAME 1 THREAD: Gardner Webb vs. SMU

Postby Stallion » Sat Nov 12, 2016 2:19 am

actually although late arriving-it was probably one of the best attended November cakewalks in SMU History. Historically Texans don't pay attention to Basketball until January
"With a quarter of a tank of gas, we can get everything we need right here in DFW." -SMU Head Coach Chad Morris

When momentum starts rolling downhill in recruiting-WATCH OUT.
Stallion
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 44302
Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2000 4:01 am
Location: Dallas,Texas,USA

Re: OFFICIAL GAME 1 THREAD: Gardner Webb vs. SMU

Postby sadderbudweiser » Sat Nov 12, 2016 7:49 am

JasonB wrote:First half was ugly - they weren't posting anyone up, they had one guy at the free throw line, everone else on the perimeter and nobody was driving. Just bad offense.

Second half the spacing was much better and we took them off the dribble. Opened up space on the perimeter and allowed us to use our athleticism on the boards.

Really using Shake, Sterling, Gu as combo guards. No true point. Could be interesting but will hurt us in close games with nobody taking over.



Actually they WERE trying to post up but they could't get the ball inside. The turnovers were almost all bad passes from the outside in.

Defensively We made some good adjustments at halftime. It was a very good defensive game....except for Harry.... He looked glued to the floor on D.

I would have liked to see Deshawn for 5 minutes or so. I hope he doen't dissappear on the bench.

I liked what i saw from Ben E. He will be a key contributor.

Jarrey? He's going to be great. Nailed his free throws too! I like him off the bench but getting starter minutes.

Sterling was Sterling. Steady Eddie. Lve that guy.

Ben Moore? He has good games, bad games and great games. We need him to have ( at the very least) good games against the better teams.

Semi and Shake will be fine. I'm way more concerned about losing Semi to the NBA than Shake though.
Party at The Wopper!
sadderbudweiser
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 6069
Joined: Mon Jan 27, 2014 6:58 am
Location: East Hampton, NY

Re: OFFICIAL GAME 1 THREAD: Gardner Webb vs. SMU

Postby NastyStang » Sat Nov 12, 2016 8:48 am

PonyUpPaula wrote:
PonySnob wrote:Game production isn't on it's game yet either


I agree. It was awful. The atmosphere was so quiet and boring. Also, that entrance video was not as exciting as in the past. My family and I usually have fun, but my kids were begging me to leave. Very disappointing. I would also suggest getting the football DJ. He is much better.


We do need the football DJ and playlist. Hardly any music played - zero music during starting lineups was weird!
User avatar
NastyStang
Varsity
 
Posts: 496
Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2008 2:58 pm
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: OFFICIAL GAME 1 THREAD: Gardner Webb vs. SMU

Postby Arkpony » Sat Nov 12, 2016 9:03 am

There was music?
Long live Inez Perez!
User avatar
Arkpony
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 6461
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 4:01 am
Location: Little Rock, AR USA

Previous

Return to Basketball

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests