Reasonable Goal for Season?

With Conference play just around the corner and having seen every home game so far, I was trying in my mind to come up with what I would like to see happen this year given the players and our talent level.
First of all, with the exception of Memphis, Conference USA is AWEFUL overall as a basketball conference. Houston, UAB, and UTEP have some potential, but each has had at least one bad loss so far. Here are the Sagarin ratings:
18 CONFERENCE USA = 71.57
College Basketball 2005-2006 Div I games only
HOME ADVANTAGE= 4.78 RATING W L
3 Memphis = 94.79 9 1
76 Houston = 79.79 3 3
95 UAB = 78.61 5 3
121 UTEP = 75.80 4 2
182 SMU = 72.16 4 3
201 Tulsa = 71.31 3 5
235 Rice = 69.02 2 5
243 Central Florida(UCF) = 68.65 3 3
256 Marshall = 67.53 4 4
265 Tulane = 67.10 2 5
291 East Carolina = 65.21 3 5
299 Southern Miss = 64.43 3 6
For me, I would like to see SMU finish 2nd in the conference and get the number 2 seed for the tournament. That goal is a bit lofty, but I think it is possible, given the competition we play. Houston or UAB has a bit of an edge on us and we do have to play Houston at their house, but we do get UAB at home.
I think anything less than #4 would be a disapointment and a wasted opportunity with so many conference mates being down/rebuilding this year.
We have a good opportunity to win 22-24 games this year and maybe sneak into the NIT considering we get to play so many weak teams in the conference. Of course, we are going to have to win the games we are supposed to and SMU is notorious for not doing that.
Against this competition, BHop can be the real difference maker. Like him or not, the vast majority of the CUSA teams have no one that can approach his skill level. I would love for us to fight Houston and UAB for the number 2 seed all year and at least garner some NIT consideration. I think it is possible given the competition and I would consider that a successful season and something to build upon.
First of all, with the exception of Memphis, Conference USA is AWEFUL overall as a basketball conference. Houston, UAB, and UTEP have some potential, but each has had at least one bad loss so far. Here are the Sagarin ratings:
18 CONFERENCE USA = 71.57
College Basketball 2005-2006 Div I games only
HOME ADVANTAGE= 4.78 RATING W L
3 Memphis = 94.79 9 1
76 Houston = 79.79 3 3
95 UAB = 78.61 5 3
121 UTEP = 75.80 4 2
182 SMU = 72.16 4 3
201 Tulsa = 71.31 3 5
235 Rice = 69.02 2 5
243 Central Florida(UCF) = 68.65 3 3
256 Marshall = 67.53 4 4
265 Tulane = 67.10 2 5
291 East Carolina = 65.21 3 5
299 Southern Miss = 64.43 3 6
For me, I would like to see SMU finish 2nd in the conference and get the number 2 seed for the tournament. That goal is a bit lofty, but I think it is possible, given the competition we play. Houston or UAB has a bit of an edge on us and we do have to play Houston at their house, but we do get UAB at home.
I think anything less than #4 would be a disapointment and a wasted opportunity with so many conference mates being down/rebuilding this year.
We have a good opportunity to win 22-24 games this year and maybe sneak into the NIT considering we get to play so many weak teams in the conference. Of course, we are going to have to win the games we are supposed to and SMU is notorious for not doing that.
Against this competition, BHop can be the real difference maker. Like him or not, the vast majority of the CUSA teams have no one that can approach his skill level. I would love for us to fight Houston and UAB for the number 2 seed all year and at least garner some NIT consideration. I think it is possible given the competition and I would consider that a successful season and something to build upon.