What O.U. Is Looking For!

Big-name coach unnecessary for OU
By Berry Tramel
The Oklahoman
Joe Castiglione's great coaching odyssey continues with plenty of rumor and even more stipulations.
The requirements for Castiglione, some self-imposed, some not, are many. Find a coach who meets all, or dang near most, of the following criteria:
1. Winner, which is the prime directive of all coaches in this bottom-line game of college hoops.
2. Purer than Caesar's wife, in the wake of OU's NCAA probe.
3. Self-assurance, which can guide a man in the many times when the spotlight will ignore him, since football is king in these parts.
4. Uptempo sage in this slowdown age, which could ignite much-needed excitement.
5. Big name who can sell tickets in a marketplace that is becoming quite competitive for the entertainment dollar.
Go 5-for-5, and Castiglione ascends to wizard status. Frankly, I can't name the man who fits all five essentials, including Roy Williams and Mike Krzyzewski, who long have been big man on their campus and might find rough sailing sharing with a gridiron emperor.
OK, here's one. Billy Donovan, who I guess is NCAA clean. Can the Sooners hire Florida's coach, fresh off a national title? Don't think so.
So Castiglione is going to have to compromise somewhere, and here's my suggestion: No. 5.
A big name is absolutely unnecessary. Nice, but unnecessary.
A big name would make a big splash and generate a frenzy around a program that has stagnated with the public. Apathy has grown like fungus around the Sooner basketball fan base.
All new hires create a buzz; a big-name kicker would thrill the crimsons and make Lloyd Noble Center a popping place next winter.
A coach with the clout of a Tubby Smith or a John Calipari would signal to any holdouts that OU is serious about basketball and would keep fire kindled during what figures to be a rebuilding season in 2006-07.
But the benefits of a big name provide only temporary tonic. A big name will not sell tickets in Year No. 3. By then, such a coach's stock, at least at OU, will be based not on what he brought to Norman, but what he's done since he got there.
Quick fixes are not the answer for Castiglione, in any of the criteria.
I don't think Joe C.'s head would be turned by a coach who promises to bring in a couple of salty power forwards. Yes, the Sooners are in need of inside players, but this hire is about much more than one season.
This hire is about the long-term good of OU hoops. This hire is about a worthy successor to the 14-year term of Billy Tubbs and the 12-year term of Kelvin Sampson.
Tubbs and Sampson are about as different as any two coaches could be, but this they have in common: neither were big names when hired by OU. The Sooners went after John Thompson in 1980 and Bob Huggins in 1994. They settled for Tubbs and Sampson, and it worked out famously.
Sooner basketball has been nationally prominent and in solid hands for almost all of the last 25 years. Castiglione's decision is critical not because OU hoops are at a wrinkle in time, but because it's vital anytime you select a drover for a program that's been this consistently competitive.
A big name is fine. But a big name is not required.
By Berry Tramel
The Oklahoman
Joe Castiglione's great coaching odyssey continues with plenty of rumor and even more stipulations.
The requirements for Castiglione, some self-imposed, some not, are many. Find a coach who meets all, or dang near most, of the following criteria:
1. Winner, which is the prime directive of all coaches in this bottom-line game of college hoops.
2. Purer than Caesar's wife, in the wake of OU's NCAA probe.
3. Self-assurance, which can guide a man in the many times when the spotlight will ignore him, since football is king in these parts.
4. Uptempo sage in this slowdown age, which could ignite much-needed excitement.
5. Big name who can sell tickets in a marketplace that is becoming quite competitive for the entertainment dollar.
Go 5-for-5, and Castiglione ascends to wizard status. Frankly, I can't name the man who fits all five essentials, including Roy Williams and Mike Krzyzewski, who long have been big man on their campus and might find rough sailing sharing with a gridiron emperor.
OK, here's one. Billy Donovan, who I guess is NCAA clean. Can the Sooners hire Florida's coach, fresh off a national title? Don't think so.
So Castiglione is going to have to compromise somewhere, and here's my suggestion: No. 5.
A big name is absolutely unnecessary. Nice, but unnecessary.
A big name would make a big splash and generate a frenzy around a program that has stagnated with the public. Apathy has grown like fungus around the Sooner basketball fan base.
All new hires create a buzz; a big-name kicker would thrill the crimsons and make Lloyd Noble Center a popping place next winter.
A coach with the clout of a Tubby Smith or a John Calipari would signal to any holdouts that OU is serious about basketball and would keep fire kindled during what figures to be a rebuilding season in 2006-07.
But the benefits of a big name provide only temporary tonic. A big name will not sell tickets in Year No. 3. By then, such a coach's stock, at least at OU, will be based not on what he brought to Norman, but what he's done since he got there.
Quick fixes are not the answer for Castiglione, in any of the criteria.
I don't think Joe C.'s head would be turned by a coach who promises to bring in a couple of salty power forwards. Yes, the Sooners are in need of inside players, but this hire is about much more than one season.
This hire is about the long-term good of OU hoops. This hire is about a worthy successor to the 14-year term of Billy Tubbs and the 12-year term of Kelvin Sampson.
Tubbs and Sampson are about as different as any two coaches could be, but this they have in common: neither were big names when hired by OU. The Sooners went after John Thompson in 1980 and Bob Huggins in 1994. They settled for Tubbs and Sampson, and it worked out famously.
Sooner basketball has been nationally prominent and in solid hands for almost all of the last 25 years. Castiglione's decision is critical not because OU hoops are at a wrinkle in time, but because it's vital anytime you select a drover for a program that's been this consistently competitive.
A big name is fine. But a big name is not required.